Here is the shorter, simpler version of my lit review for SIT... the conclusion is kind of whack since I didn't really know how to talk about my personal learning outcomes while still sounding professional, and keep in mind that the assignment was called a literature review, but wasn't really one at all. And it is background research for an ISP project. mmkay then.
The numbers correspond to footnotes that didn't paste into here, unfortunately.
Introduction:
The United Nations recently revealed that the number of hungry people in the world has climbed from roughly 850 million to about 925 million during the last year of the world food crisis. With almost one billion of the world's population living in an extreme state of food insecurity, the international community is tenaciously seeking solutions. For the past half-century, green revolution style attempts to boost agricultural production have been the mainstream answer to the hunger problem; however, an expansive body of literature has simultaneously developed to reveal the extreme drawbacks of this method. At the same time, a body of literature and science has emerged describing an alternative practice, small scale sustainable agriculture in all of its forms. This paper will address what will loosely be termed home gardening, because is accessible to a wide range of people, specifically the most vulnerable. Despite the wealth of literature and study on the subject, the available information remains disconnected and the terminology varied, with few solid links between ecology, culture, and food security. This constitutes a major problem for proponents of home gardens, who often find themselves overshadowed by the consolidated money interests supporting Green Revolution technologies.
This literature review will offer background information to explain the relevance of this topic to the international community as well as national and local bodies. It will proceed to argue, based on the existing literature, that home gardening offers a viable and culturally appropriate strategy for achieving food security and adequate nutrition on the grassroots level, particularly in Sub-Saharan Africa. However, it is important to also recognize the drawbacks of the existing bodies of literature, as well as the challenges for home garden programs to develop a best practice. The utility of home gardens for addressing the needs of the hungry, particularly women and children, can only be fully realized by overcoming these obstacles. This overview of a variety of agricultural methods in multiple cultural settings will inform the direction of an independent study project, which will take the focus deeper into a particular community and program development.
The Food Crisis and Hunger in Africa:
Global discourse suggests that the world food crisis is characterized by a dramatic increase in the prices of food, particularly staple foods such as maize, wheat, rice, dairy, and vegetable oils. The crisis is believed to be caused by a “perfect storm” of factors, namely changing populations, the bio-fuel industry, financial speculation, climate change, production shortages, and long term agricultural trade and domestic policies1. An international agreement on the causes of the crisis is mainstream; representatives from think tanks like the South Center, agricultural trade and policy advisors, speakers from the World Food Program and the UN High Commission for Human Rights, as well as countless academics and government officials, recognize that the crisis is a product of human decisions.
Food shortages and famines are notorious for affecting the continent of Africa with a disproportionate force, and it is important to note that sub-Saharan Africa has been bypassed by most of the global gains made in food security over the last century2. As a vestige of colonization, small land owners have often been marginalized to make room for the large scale production of staples, which in turn has created an imbalance between food and cash crops3. Africa is also home to most of the world's Least Developed Countries (LDC's) and is benefiting the least from both economic liberalism and modern aid strategies, suggesting a need for innovative solutions to the hunger problem.
Freedom from hunger and malnutrition as a human right has been on the border of international discussion for generations, and is recognized by some global agreements such as the International Covenant on Economic, Social, and Cultural Rights as well as the Universal Declaration on the Eradication of Hunger and Malnutrition. However, intergovernmental organizations such as the United Nations High Commission for Human Rights have a difficult time creating a consensus on food as a human right, due in part, reported a representative, to countries' reluctance to make food security more inclusive, with obligations, accountability, and international enforcement methods.4 This lack of consensus on a rights-based obligation to address the food crisis has contributed to the haphazard national and international responses to the food crisis.
Relying on international agreements or even national plans to take immediate and effective action to secure food security for those in need is problematic. Countries have been trying a variety of strategies, from tinkering with subsidies to restricting exports while the international community has attempted to find a solution5. While the UN International Fund for Agricultural Development called on member states to “urgently direct their policy attention and their investments towards small-holder agriculture and rural livelihoods,” an idea echoed by the World Bank Report 2008, the chance of genuine structural changes in the food system to assist small holder livelihoods is minimal.
The New Partnership for Africa's Development (NEPAD) shows a complex and potentially self-defeating mix of perspectives and ideas6. The 2004 meeting supported boosting staple crop production by following the Asian method, which is heavily chemical, petrol and irrigation dependent as well as out of the price range of most African farmers. Kwesi Atta-Krah explained in expert detail the importance of biodiversity to sustainable systems, and then proceeded to promote GMO monocrops. Norman Borlaug, chief spokesman for the Green Revolution and a specialist at the 2004 conference, explained that Africans shouldn't allow themselves to be confused by discussions about the environment and sustainability, but should instead push forward production maximization. The World Bank's policy is just as scattered; one page of the 2008 report urges sub-Saharan African countries to help farmers increase production because agriculture “has special powers for reducing poverty,” yet a few pages later the report stresses the importance of moving African farmers off their land and into cities7.
The food crisis has been linked strongly and credibly to international agricultural trade policies and the global food system. The food-scape of today is distinguished by consolidation; the South Center reports that not only is global food production incredibly concentrated into the hands of roughly six corporations, but these companies (Nestle, Cargill, Archer Daniels, etc) have taken in huge profits in response to the global price increases, while the actual producers have seen little to no gain8. Other sources reveal that less than 5% of landowners control roughly 80% of the world's farmland9. Development analysist Duncan Green explains that current trends suggest that corporate consolidation is only likely to grow in extent, and OXFAM agrees by stating that, “any agreement based on what is currently on the table at the WTO is likely to undermine, rather than strengthen, developing country agricultural systems and is unlikely to solve the current crisis”1011. Due to the structural difficulties facing the global food system and uncertainty over if, when, how, and why changes should or should not be made, it is critically important to explore food security measures that do not rely on national or international political or economic bodies. Grassroots solutions may be the best, if not the only, feasible option for achieving food security.
Why Promote Home Gardening Techniques:
Home gardens and the techniques associated with them are inexpensive, productive, and practical for land owners, renters, and even the landless. Generations of pressure from governments and colonizing powers have promoted cash crop mono-cultures throughout the developing world, which has led to desertification and lower soil productivity in much of Africa12. The pressure to grow for export has also contributed to a decline in traditional farming practices, including the cultivation of supplementary indigenous crops. Today, in many regions of Africa traditional plants are only harvested in the wild, often in times of famine13. Dominant agricultural discourse overlooks the “hidden harvest” of the wild bounty remaining in developing countries and their traditional use, focusing instead on capital intensive technologies. The U.S. Office of Technology Assessments reports that to be successful, the agricultural technology promoted in sub-Saharan Africa must instead be small scale, affordable, low risk, locally produced, adapted to local labor, and consistent with traditional agriculture14. Home gardening and associated practices are able to sustainably fulfill these requirements as well as increase food security.
Home gardening is used as an overarching term for planting near the home primarily for consumption. This overview discusses traditional garden plots, fallow plots, alley gardening, urban agriculture, and guerrilla gardening as a collection of strategies for achieving food security within a variety of cultural contexts. Depending on the society, gardening techniques can be easily adapted to suit traditional growing practices. In addition to addressing hunger and malnutrition, small scale gardening has the potential to increase production, help boost people out of economic poverty, and rehabilitate the environment.
Health and Nutrition
Traditionally, a vast majority of sub-Saharan African cultures, particularly those in the arid and tropical regions, relied on gathering and occasionally planting wild plants as a way to supplement their diets, gather medicine, and ward off hunger in times of famine. In the Sahel, over 800 different edible wild species have been recorded, which historically contributed to the diets of local people15. Over time, however, colonization, cash cropping, deforestation, the use of chemical sprays, and other modern methods have decreased the wild food available, and other contributors such as food aid have begun to alter gathering patterns. This has replaced highly nutritious local food sources with staples, contributing to malnutrition even in the absence of hunger. Studies indicate that local food sources, specifically those planted and gathered from small size African gardens, can provide 15-30% of recommended daily amounts of calories and proteins, and almost all required vitamin A, vitamin C, B-complex, iron, lysine, calcium, fat, iodine, as well as medicinal and traditional herbs16. A Zimbabwe study confirms that families living in close proximity to forests, gardens, and other diverse food sources are significantly healthier than those who are not17.
One of the greatest benefits of planting local semi-cultivars is that the natural plants work together as a system. Wild plants, annuals or perennials, naturally grow together in a poly-culture where they complement each others growing seasons, nutrients, and even have the ability to defend each other from the elements and pests18. The Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations reports that indigenous vegetables are healthy and relatively easy to grow in most of Africa; however, Western agents often promote the cultivation of plants that are exotic to the continent, leaving livelihoods susceptible to droughts and pests. Indigenous foods also have the benefit of being suited to the cultures' traditional tastes and practices, making them highly culturally appropriate.
Whether planting in a home garden, on fallow land, eroded gullies, or roadsides, securing a diverse food supply is critical especially in times of famine or crop failure. Because natural plant systems complement each other's growing seasons, there are several healthy, popular plants like the locust bean in West Africa that grow during the traditional hungry season19. Leafy green vegetables and other indigenous herbs and plants can grow within weeks and perennial mixed gardens are capable of producing drought and pest resistant produce year round for families. The FAO defines food security as existing when “all people at all times have physical social and economic access to sufficient, safe, and nutritious food which meets their dietary needs and food preferences for an active and healthy life”20. By having control over a continuous, stable, and sustainable food source that requires little labor or monetary input, people are brought closer to food security.
Production
The Western Sahel is one of the few places in the world that has actually seen a decrease in production over the last half century, and the rest of Africa has struggled to keep production stable on soil that is suffering desertification due to overuse21. Mixed garden agriculture, by returning nutrients like nitrogen to the soil and allowing a variety of plants to complement each other, has been shown to increase the productivity of the individual crops22. Studies also indicate that over time, polycultures show dramatic production rates relative to monoculture fields, in addition to the fact that mixed gardens can grow where staple crops generally cannot23. In the Western Sahel, wild grain varieties have also been shown to have dramatically higher production rates than their domestic counterparts, as well as higher nutrition even when they growing completely independent of human care24. In addition, the World Bank Report 2008 reports that small scale farmers “often remain the most efficient producers,” which OXFAM recognizes with their small holder seed fairs.25 At these seed fairs, OXFAM sells local seed varieties for a low cost to encourage an increase in local and productive crops26.
Poverty Alleviation
On average, people living in LDC's spend between 50-80% of their incomes on food, even those who live and work on farmland. By producing nutritious supplemental vegetables, nuts, tubers, fruit, and greens, a family has the ability to reduce their household food expenditures, and even potentially sell some food for revenue. A pilot garden program in Senegal resulted in families earning the equivalent of 20% of what the family determined a good salary from the sale of their extra produce27. One key benefit to growing local crops is that seeds are often free and unpatented, and a farmer is able to gather them from the wild or their own harvest to save money. Once relative food security is secured and with the assistance of additional income, people are more likely to take risks, make investments, and move from subsistence agriculture to business28. The protection offered by perennial gardens also decreases people's reliance on traders and loans during food shortages, helping stave off debt. Smallholders are more likely to reinvest their wealth in the local community than large farms, who tend to spend and save profits abroad, and the local varieties are generally immune to international fluctuations such as currency rates, trade policies, fuel prices, etc2930. Together, these factors help people to build stronger livelihoods as well as stronger communities.
Environmental Sustainability
Arid and tropical sub-Saharan Africa is primarily characterized by low activity, clay or sandy soils which are highly vulnerable to erosion, have low nutrient exchange capabilities, and have low water retention capabilities31. To grow under these conditions, farmers traditionally practiced a variety of strategies similar to bush-fallow, where crops are grown for a certain period of time and then the land is left to rehabilitate. Today, however, these systems are failing; due to population increases and poverty, residues from cash crops are collected and sold rather than left to regenerate the soil, and new crops are planted much sooner32. Little legal framework exists to prevent desertification or preserve bio-diversity, leaving the burden of land preservation upon the pastoralists, farmers, and forest dwellers who rely on it for food. By planting natural vegetation, local people can protect the soil around their communities or in fields from high temperatures, wind erosion, and sandblasting, as well as return nitrogen to the soil with leguminous browse. By mixing animal and crop production, they are able to encourage grazing that returns even more SOM (soil organic matter), preserving a diverse natural system that is essential to the long term sustainability of agriculture33.
Rural Settings:
Presently, roughly ¾ of the world's poor lives in rural settings, 2.7 billion of whom live on less than two dollars a day, and most of whom depend on agriculture for their livelihoods34. Often the poorest and most vulnerable of these people have little energy and live in communities on degenerated land, lacking fuel and water, and often lacking healthy adult males who leave to find wage work35. As net food buyers they are especially susceptible to changes in world food prices, often only a breath away from asset disposal and starvation. There are several different forms of low cost, low labor, small scale gardening that could help individuals in this situation while staying in tuned with cultural norms. It is critical to recognize that sub-Saharan Africa is made up of about as many farming and food systems as ethno-linguistic groups; this overview will discuss a few methods that can carry over a multitude of general practices, however for any project design it would be of the greatest importance to study the practices suited to a specific culture, and even a specific community.
Many African communities can be characterized by a mix of pastoralism and crop production, appearing as bush-fallow systems (also known as swidden agriculture or shifting cultivation). This form of agriculture is seen all over the world. Traditionally only lightly planted, fallows offer an opportunity for families and communities to build high producing, low input intensive polycultures of trees and vegetables, rehabilitating the land while feeding themselves. In this situation it is especially important to carefully select the plant mixes based on ecological research to determine an appropriate mix to give back rather than take from the land, and to grow with the minimum amount of water. Another appropriate small scale technique is the traditional “kraal” garden, which combines crop cultivation with livestock. These plots take advantage of the organic material and seeds left by livestock in kraals where they are kept at night; when they are no longer used for animals, these kraals are planted and turned into gardens.
Alley farming is another strategic form of small scale agriculture that can be adapted to overcome the constraints where home gardens are not practical. Alley farming is an agroforestry system where food crops are grown in shaded alleys between leguminous hedgerows or trees and can be grown on either fallow land or integrated with cash crops36. In practice this strategy builds upon traditional farming systems, making it generally culturally acceptable. Leaves and prunnings from the trees are used to create green manure while the trees fix nitrogen in the soil, the rooting system minimizes soil erosion, and the trees provide both animal fodder and firewood.
Food Gardens Unlimited (FGU), a South African NGO, demonstrates the benefits associated with small garden plots close to the home site. This project assists particularly the most marginalized people in the region of South Africa by providing an ideal mix of low cost seeds and basic training to establish productive garden plots of a practical size. The plant beds they encourage are only a few square meters and are created using biodegradable household rubbish for the lower layer, sub and top soil from the local area, and completed with a scattering dry plant waste over the top. Four of these small gardens can reportedly provide enough supplementary food for a family year round37. FGU stresses companion planting, which has built in insect control, and the program is coupled with education about crop rotation and simple natural methods of agricultural disease prevention. Their program has proven successful in a blend of hostile squatter cities, arid isolated impoverished villages, new villages with no infrastructure, and other challenging locations. One of the greater successes of the project is its ability to connect with existing structures within the community and use successful local multipliers38.
Urban Settings:
While obtaining food security in rural regions is of critical importance for eradicating poverty, it is equally important to address small scale gardening as a tool for urban settings. The UN reports that 2008 is the first year in history when more than half of the world's population live in urban settings and most of these urbanites rely on food supplied and transported from their rural counterparts39. In African cities, urban and peri-urban agriculture can help ease the urban food demand and promote greater sanitation through the compost of biodegradable refuse40. Highly perishable foods such as vegetables, fruit, small livestock, fish, and poultry are incredibly expensive to transport from farm to city; urban and peri-urban production has the ability to reduce the cost for urban dwellers. As of 1999, over 800 million people practiced urban agriculture throughout the world, and sub-Saharan African cities generally have large inner and outer zones well suited to small scale production41. A locally produced supply could in large part reduce the cost burden for African urban dwellers, who can spend up to 75% of their incomes on food alone42.
Urban agriculture is highly adaptable, and food can be grown on abandoned property, underdeveloped private or public space, land unsuited for building, roadsides, boxes, or in more formal gardens43. While community or large scale gardens often require secure property rights for at least one holder, small and innovative forms of agriculture are possible even in the absence of property rights. Leafy greens and other indigenous plants are able to grow quickly and through forms of shifting cultivation can circumscribe the need for secure land rights. While production within or nearby cities can be costly (fertilizers, etc), research into both traditional and innovative organic methods provides people with simple, low cost, natural strategies for maintaining soil productivity and pest control. The problem of urban refuse could be largely aided by grassroots systems that transform urban waste into production materials. For example, a case study in Cotonou found that urban farmers often used dredge, cottonseed remains, composted garbage, and chicken manure to maintain their soils44.
Urban agriculture techniques, particularly guerrilla gardening and community gardens, also have the possibility to feed the landless. A representative from the UNHCR said that roughly 1/5 of the world's hungry are in fact landless45. Renters may be able to grow small garden plots on their rented land, but others have to rely completely on purchased food. By growing crops either in coordination with the local community or simply on abandoned, underused, or eroded land, the landless are able to supplement their diet nutritiously while diminishing their food bill. For landless or nomadic people living in rural settings, reseeding forage areas may be critical to maintaining a continuous supply of wild foods.
Gender Perspective:
Arguably, a socially just system should ensure that resources and power are distributed equitably so that the basic needs of all are met and their rights assured, especially in regards to control of resources and participation46. Unfortunately the global food system leaves the poor, specifically women and children, at a clear disadvantage. Women and children are nutritionally the most vulnerable group in developing countries, particularly women and girl children who are often the last to be fed47. Recent decreases in the supply of wild foods, which are usually gathered, eaten, and marketed by women and children, in combination with skyrocketing commercial food prices, have hit women the hardest48. Garden projects are especially helpful to women, who constitute the majority of small holder farmers49. Local plants grown near the home have the double benefit of requiring little manual labor as well as offering a flexible harvest period; a mother or child can pick what is needed for the day rather than harvesting the entire supply all at once50. One of the greatest challenges facing garden projects is to overcome a gender bias in order to target these women. Often, surveys only examine male activities, and when they find that women aren't present they assume that women are not taking part in food production, while in fact the opposite is usually true. Low input small scale solutions are especially effective for increasing the access of women and their children to food and nutrition.
Case Study: The Ilesha Project
This project was chosen as a case study because it is one of the first successful garden programs that pays special attention to being cultural appropriate. While it was institutionally funded, the program was designed and implemented by a small non-governmental group. The program illustrates several of the most important successes as well as challenges that garden programs still face.
The Ilesha Project, initiated in the 1960's, illustrates the challenges and successes of harm garden projects within small communities. The Ilesha Project was one of many Applied Nutrition Projects funded by the Food and Agriculture Organization (FAO) during the 1960's and 1970's, which aimed to improve nutrition by increasing the production and consumption of supplementary foods such as legumes, leafy vegetables, and fruits. The project proved to be innovative for the time, introducing a traditional Indonesian style of mixed garden that is today regarded of one of the most productive and sustainable forms of agriculture. It also supported local and traditional horticultural research to increase production and solve pest problems naturally, with minimum external inputs, while supplying complimentary nutrition information. Most importantly, their methods proved very acceptable to the local Yoruba speakers.
The project site, the Ilesha region in West Nigeria, is characterized by high temperatures, mixed rainy and dry periods, and tropical vegetation. Because the region focused heavily on the production of cash crops, space for food crops was extremely limited, exasperating hunger amongst the population. Childhood mortality due to malnutrition was a critical problem for the local people, who were specifically deficient in protein, riboflavin, iron, and folic acid.
One of the program's greater strength was the quality of research that went into developing the program parameters. With local extensionists or multipliers, the program staff determined what foods were eaten, by whom, when, specific dietary deficiencies, and popular local foods that could address those needs. Substantial effort went into the study of the most culturally appropriate foods, which were primarily local varieties. Local crops, unlike their exotic counterpart, not only suited the bitter-tastes of the locals better, but were able to grow more easily and produce more seeds for the next planting.
Prior to the project's implementation, local vegetables were gathered from fallow or abandoned land, roadsides, or the bush By offering the same varieties within the home garden, a system of continuous project was established close to the home. Because most of the preferred local crops were annuals, special care went into creating complimentary blends of plants to provide year round food, adequate rain and sun protection, as well as suitable natural blends to prevent pest problems. Within four years, 638 home gardens had been established in ten pilot villages operated by a virtually even distribution of men, women, and children.
The program began with a large, institutionalized research and demonstration garden in a centralized location, and offered a basic design that was multi-layered and fenced. While at first these seemed to be important strategies for replication and goat-defense, these two factors specifically were not suited to the local people. Decentralized gardens supported by locals of average means proved to be the most self replicating, and the expensive fences were quickly abandoned in favor of thorny hedges.
The Ilesha project faced many of the constrains common to garden projects in Africa, such as the dry season, manure and water availability, and cultural restrictions that required creative and innovative solutions from the local people and project staff. The concept of household space proved to be the greatest cultural constraint to the project. Villagers traditionally kept vegetation away from the home space to minimize snake bites and pests. However, when villagers saw their neighbors buying less and less food from markets and procuring more from their own gardens, they generally found the benefits to outweigh the harms51. The necessity for this adaptation could have possibly been avoided if the program had focused on a different form of gardening that was not located so close to the home site, but rather within the alleys of cash crops or on nearby fallow land.
Project Design and Cultural Constraints:
Constraints
Due in part to the disconnect between home gardening resources in literature, garden projects are often plagued by a variety of problems, primarily stemming from inaccurate assessments of the host culture and resources. Inaccurate surveys often miscalculate the needs and abilities of the people they survey, ignoring forms of labor or agriculture that are unfamiliar to the project staff, or assuming an abundance of strong, healthy labor. They also have difficulties accurately determining land rights; for example, in some cultural settings land rights are determined by whether or not the land is plowed, and gardeners only need to plow every four or five years rather than multiple times per year. The availability of basic inputs such as water is often misjudged, and some programs specifically target one gender at the expense of the other. Often NGO's offer agricultural methods requiring iron tools, bar fences, wells, and other resources that are costly as well as difficult for locals to repair, obtain, or replicate. Another common constraint seen throughout the literature was the trend of Western donors to bring Western crops, which generally do not suit local tastes, require too much water, and actually have lower nutritional density when compared to the relatively tropical local plants52.
Distinct cultural constraints also exist, regarding land use as well as diet. The concept of home space varies from culture to culture, and within some groups growing or establishing fences or hedges near the home disturbs the concept of the home space and community. It is also important to note that while historically wild grains, legumes, vegetables, tubers, and nuts were common supplements to the sub-Saharan diet, today many of these wild plants have been effectively marginalized. As people increasingly work for wages and buy commercial food, they are moved out of the sphere of the wild harvest, often losing the ability to recognize and appreciate the benefit of wild plants. Nutritious leafy green vegetables or high fat content nuts in some cultures are now considered nothing more than snack food for children or forage for the poor, thus carrying a cultural stigma that can only be combated through education53.
Successes
These limitations do not apply to all home garden programs; hundreds have been able to invest in quality research and evaluations in order to accurately determine a population's needs and capabilities. For every mistake listed above, another program has found a solution. Making connections with local institutions, particularly in the health field, is an important strategy for entering the community and an excellent tool for distributing nutrition knowledge. Program staff who are from the community, highly trained, and of an average social class prove to be the most effective multipliers, triggering higher participation rates despite cultural reservations. Local connections are integral for the project design and implementation, as is encouraging locals to find solutions and innovations on their own. Successful projects also set up sustainable systems for distributing seeds, knowledge, and other forms of assistance54.
These projects are most often organized by NGO's, but receive a surprising amount of funding from the United Nations and individual governments. The FAO has shown interest in the role of minor crops in a variety of programs, from nutrition to forestry to food security. During the UN “Freedom from Hunger Campaign” during the 50's, 60's, and 70's, the FAO and UNICEF sponsored hundreds of Applied Nutrition Programs that either focused on gardening or promoted it as a part of a larger strategy55. The governments of India, Ghana, Cuba, Sri Lanka, Colombia, Chile, the Philippines, and a variety of other nations have made home gardening a national priority through inter-ministerial units.
Conclusion:
Overall, the available literature on home gardening proved to be extensive, yet disconnected. Sources focused primarily on either the ecology and sustainability of small scale agriculture or the socioeconomic benefits, but few strong links were established between the natural and social sciences. Home gardening programs have been important tools for promoting health and development over the past half century, yet have remained over-shadowed by mainstream discourses in modern, technology intensive agriculture. Knowledge and information on the home gardening projects have been relatively marginalized within literature of the dominant discourse, potentially preventing a full realization of the benefits of gardening programs. Without performing significant research, one might not be aware that these projects exist, much less that hundreds have been pursued around the world as part of UN Development strategy.
The overview presented in this paper provides a useful framework for the further investigation and program design of a gardening project within a specific cultural and climactic context. Without this study, it would be difficult to determine potential avenues for an Independent Study Project because the information lacks accessibility. The primary learning outcome of this paper was to discover that the uncertain and unsupported idea of the author was in fact relatively common in development programs, although not necessarily a popularized topic. By reviewing the flaws and successes of a variety of different programs in multiple settings, one is able to refine and specify a future project in regards to the population it may serve, the methods available, and identify potential failures or difficulties. These projects operate under the umbrella of pro-poor development theory and food as a human right. Circumventing slow and conflicted governmental or intergovernmental policies, gardening projects provide near immediate results for the world's most needy in a way that is sustainable and relies primarily on the resources at hand.
Sources:
Casella, E. World Food Program briefing. 29-9-08
“FAO Report: Vegetable Production under Arid and Semi-Arid Conditions in Tropical Africa.” Plant
Production and Protection. 1988.
Institute for Agriculture and Trade Policy. “Turning High Prices Into an Opportunity: What is
Needed?”, Minneapolis, Minnesota, 2008.
OXFAM International. “The Time is Now: how the world leaders should respond to the food price
crisis”, Oxfam Briefing Note, London, 3 June 2008
Quadranti, B. UNHCR briefing. 29-9-08
Rodriguez, L. South Center briefing. 3-10-08
South Center. “Liberalizing food trade to death”, South Bulletin Reflections and Foresights, Geneva,
16 June 2008.
South Bulletin Editorial EPA'S WILL BENEFIT EUROPE OF THE COST OF BOTH ACP AND
LATIN AMERICAN COUNTRIES. Yyash Tandon, Executive Director of South Center. 16 June 2008. Issue 17.
The World Bank. “Agriculture for Development: Overview”, World Development Report 2008,
Washington, D.C., 2007
UNCTAD. “Addressing the Global Food Crisis: Key trade, investment, and commodity policies in
ensuring sustainable food security and alleviating poverty”, United Nations, Geneva, 2008
Works:
Allen, P. and Dusen, D. ed. “Global Perspectives on Agroecology and Sustainable Agricultural
Systems. Proceeding of the sixth international scientific conference of the international federation of organic agriculture movement.” Volume 1 and Volume 2.
Barrow, E. “Trees and Pastoralists: The Case of the Pokat and Turkana.” Network paper 6b. Social
Forestry Network. ODI. London. 1988.
Becker, B. “Wild Plants in the Nutrition of the population of arid regions in Africa: 3 Case studies from
Kenya and Senegal.” Gottinger Beitrage zur Land- und Forstwirtschaft in den Tropen und Subtropen.1984.
Breth, S ed. From Subsistence to Sustainable Agriculture in Africa. Mexico City. Sasakawa
Africa Association. (A synthesis report of NEPAD strategy). 2004.
Brownrigg, L. “Home Gardening in International Development: What the Literature Shows.” The
League for International Food Education. 1985.
Cashman, K. “The Benefits of Alley Farming for the African Farmer and her Household.” Culture &
Agriculture. Winter 1988, No. 37, pp. 1-20
Fleuret, A. “The Role of Wild Foliage plants in the diet: A case study from Lushoto, Tanzania.”
Ecology of Food and Nutrition. 1979.
Lappe, Frances M., Joseph Collins, and Peter Rosset. “World Hunger: Twelve Myths”. 2nd ed. New
York: Grove P, 1998. Pg. 136
Jackson, W. “Ecosystem Agriculture: The Management of Ecology and Agriculture,” The Land
Institute in Salina. 1980.
Mc Dowell, D and Allen, J. “Agricultural Production in Senegal”, Agroecology Program, University of
California. 1988.
Powell, J. and Williams, T. “Livestock, Nutrient Cycling, and Sustainable Agriculture in the West
African Sahel.” International Institute for Environment and Development. 1993.
Rapaely, Pauline. “A South African Socioeconomic project based on small scale low-tech food
gardening.” Original research. 1992.
Scoones, E., Melnyk, M., and Pretty, J. “The Hidden Harvest - Wild Foods and Agricultural Systems”,
International Institute for Environment and Development. 1992.
Smith, U. “Agriculture Urbaine en Afrique de L'Ouest” International Development Research Centre
CIRAD Organization, Inc NetLibrary, Centre de recherches pour le développement international. 2004.
Monday, October 13, 2008
Sunday, September 28, 2008
Italy, Lugano, and Couch Surfing
Lugano! You'd never expect a city in Switzerland to be a Mediterranean paradise, but the canton of Tucino is exactly that! The sun, the turquoise water, the huge, sheer, rolling green mountains! This isn't one of my photos, but seriously, the canton of Tucino took my breath away.
So beautiful! We spent the week walking the shores of its lake, exploring the windy cobblestone streets, and of course, attending briefings for class. Our study group had a hotel booked until Thursday night and a train ticket back to Nyon on Sunday morning, which meant that we had a weekend free. For weeks I had been trying to find a couch surfer who didn't already have guests and was getting increasingly frustrated and worried- Thursday morning and I still didn't have weekend plans, while other students were planning trips to Rome, Milan, or Germany. Thursday night Alessandro, a Venetian couch surfer, agreed to host me so Friday morning I hopped on the earliest train and went to Venice for the weekend! The city was absolutely beautiful, but what was more wonderful was the experience of couch surfing. I'd never couch surfed before and really didn't know what to expect... basically, it was a perfect weekend.
Alessandro, Marco, and Gianfranco were absolutely fabulous hosts- talkative, friendly, silly, smart, really interesting and nice- oh, and they had a beautiful apartment overlooking the water, lived in a really chill neighborhood minutes from the train, had a tiny kitten, and made the best italian food I've ever had. To top it off, Alessandro has worked in Venetian bars and fixed up some real Venetian Spritz- perfecto! We had two wonderful evenings of cooking, drinking, and exploring, and on the final night we celebrated Marco's birthday by staying up the whole night before I had to jump on the 6:30am train back to Lugano. Thus, I am now in love with couch surfing, and I vow to couch surf after my program as I explore Eastern Europe!
So beautiful! We spent the week walking the shores of its lake, exploring the windy cobblestone streets, and of course, attending briefings for class. Our study group had a hotel booked until Thursday night and a train ticket back to Nyon on Sunday morning, which meant that we had a weekend free. For weeks I had been trying to find a couch surfer who didn't already have guests and was getting increasingly frustrated and worried- Thursday morning and I still didn't have weekend plans, while other students were planning trips to Rome, Milan, or Germany. Thursday night Alessandro, a Venetian couch surfer, agreed to host me so Friday morning I hopped on the earliest train and went to Venice for the weekend! The city was absolutely beautiful, but what was more wonderful was the experience of couch surfing. I'd never couch surfed before and really didn't know what to expect... basically, it was a perfect weekend.
Alessandro, Marco, and Gianfranco were absolutely fabulous hosts- talkative, friendly, silly, smart, really interesting and nice- oh, and they had a beautiful apartment overlooking the water, lived in a really chill neighborhood minutes from the train, had a tiny kitten, and made the best italian food I've ever had. To top it off, Alessandro has worked in Venetian bars and fixed up some real Venetian Spritz- perfecto! We had two wonderful evenings of cooking, drinking, and exploring, and on the final night we celebrated Marco's birthday by staying up the whole night before I had to jump on the 6:30am train back to Lugano. Thus, I am now in love with couch surfing, and I vow to couch surf after my program as I explore Eastern Europe!
Friday, September 19, 2008
This just in...
The UN reports that the number of hungry people in the world rose from about 850 million in 2006 to 925 million in 2007. That's an increase of about 75 MILLION people. Why did this happen?
natural disasters
biofuel industry
poor economic/finance/trade policies
rising demand for meat and other complex foods
climate change that reduces growing seasons/suitability of land
and then some.
natural disasters
biofuel industry
poor economic/finance/trade policies
rising demand for meat and other complex foods
climate change that reduces growing seasons/suitability of land
and then some.
Thursday, September 18, 2008
Hey Tacoma dwellers
Iraq Vets Against the War are well on their way to building a wicked coffee shop and community space near Fort Lewis, providing a comfortable and welcoming environment for soldiers to express dissent and share questions and answers. Check out this sweet event!
October 11th: Jim Page Night of Acoustic Resistance to Benefit IVAW Coffeehouse
author: Patrick Edelbacher
Sep 17, 2008 21:20
The famous, Jim Page, and the not so famous, Patrick Edelbacher, will be preforming a set of acoustic resistance on October 11th at Kings books in Tacoma. There is a $5 cover charge to benefit Iraq Veterans Against the War and GI Voice in their quest to open a GI Coffeehouse at Ft. Lewis.
Jim Page and Patrick Edelbacher night of acoustic resistance to benefit IVAW coffeehouse. There will also be a speaker from IVAW to talk about GI Resistance Today. Support the troops!
October 11 at 7pm
$5 at the door
Kings Books
218 St. Helens Ave.
Tacoma, WA
October 11th: Jim Page Night of Acoustic Resistance to Benefit IVAW Coffeehouse
author: Patrick Edelbacher
Sep 17, 2008 21:20
The famous, Jim Page, and the not so famous, Patrick Edelbacher, will be preforming a set of acoustic resistance on October 11th at Kings books in Tacoma. There is a $5 cover charge to benefit Iraq Veterans Against the War and GI Voice in their quest to open a GI Coffeehouse at Ft. Lewis.
Jim Page and Patrick Edelbacher night of acoustic resistance to benefit IVAW coffeehouse. There will also be a speaker from IVAW to talk about GI Resistance Today. Support the troops!
October 11 at 7pm
$5 at the door
Kings Books
218 St. Helens Ave.
Tacoma, WA
Wednesday, September 17, 2008
Observation Journal
I'm almost embarrassed to be posting this... for a class assignment, we have to write two journal entries in a very specific format regarding health and politics in Switzerland. These have to focus on interactive experiences, be as interactively written as possible, and basically the rules and requirements are utterly confusing and ridiculous. We also have to use the die format- first, simple description. Then, an interpretation that addresses possible meanings. And finally, an evaluation that provides my own insight. It still needs some work but anyway, here is my Swiss observation on health in la suisse. My evaluation needs some work but I don't really know what else to say at this point- i tend to like universal health care systems, but Switzerland has a tradition for doing things its own way and I respect that.
Introduction:
One morning, my colleagues and I were given a tour of the International Red Cross and Red Crescent Museum in Geneva Switzerland. My experiences at the Red Cross left me feeling emotionally vulnerable; the museum's visualizations and symbolic representation of tragedies tugged painfully at my heartstrings, yet I felt impatient for my own opportunities to positively affect the world. As I sat down to a dinner with my Swiss host family that night, the day's emotions and memories continued to pluck and pull at my consciousness, distracting me from the conversation. My attention was completely diverted, however, when my host sister Justine began describing her meeting with a health insurance representative earlier in the afternoon. I was shocked when Justine shared her monthly quote for basic health insurance, even more so when she explained that she had to pay extra for “luxuries” like a private room separate from vulnerable children and elderly. Our ensuing conversation spurred a question within me that forms the basic prompt for this journal entry: Is there a contradiction between the humanitarian reputation of Switzerland and the health care system?
Description:
Initial Observations and Ensuing Dialogs
Before coming to Switzerland, I was aware that the country was internationally recognized for its neutrality and its acceptance and promotion of humanitarianism. Not only do international organizations such as the United Nations and the World Trade Organizations have seats in Geneva, but also a plethora of non-governmental humanitarian groups. I also held a firm belief that the Swiss way was the best way, and that undoubtedly the system in Switzerland was conductive to the people's kind and generous natures. I felt certain that the care and compassion represented by the organizations in Geneva would be reflected in the politics and society of the Swiss.
These preconceptions were re-enforced for me by both our conversation with representatives from the Swiss operational headquarters of Médecins Sans Frontières (MSF) as well as the Red Cross tour. The presentation by a representative from MSF revealed that the humanitarian aid organization was funded almost entirely by private donations, with half of the overall budget coming from Swiss donors and another third coming from fund raising activities within the country. The speaker also pointed out that the budget for the Swiss MSF had doubled between 2004 and 2008, reflecting a huge increase in the amount and/or number of Swiss donors who contributed to the aid organization.
While we had discussed the significance of the Red Cross in terms of the overall humanitarian movement while in Paris at Médecins du Monde, I did not begin to fully appreciate its place in the international dialog regarding humanitarianism until our Red Cross tour. The Red Cross Museum uses powerful symbolic representation to present their ideas and history, which for me brought their stories to life. A small concrete cell allowed us to feel like isolated prisoners, simulated land mines in the floor reminded us how easily they could be mistaken for toys, and vast towers of index cards represented lost prisoners of war and their families' desperation. The history of the Red Cross is rooted in Switzerland, where it was founded by a Swiss businessman named Henri Dunant, and from which the Geneva Conventions were born. Due to my past experiences with Amnesty International and my interest in humanitarianism, the Geneva Conventions hold incredible importance to me. Learning about the role of the Red Cross and the Swiss in their creation further increased my satisfaction with the Swiss themselves.
The same night over dinner, my Swiss sister Justine lamented about her problems with health insurance. Neither Justine nor her sister, both teachers, she explained, have succeeded in finding a full time job, therefore each of them make only a portion of an average teacher's salary. Despite their shortage in funds, they still must pay for the mandatory health insurance, which at the most basic in Vaud costs about 280 francs per month. To get extra benefits, such as a private room or access to more diverse medications and remedies, they must pay even more per month.
Listening to Justine describe her situation- spending roughly 15-20% of her monthly salary on health insurance despite being young and healthy, I couldn't help but wonder if there was some sort of contradiction between what I had seen earlier at the Red Cross Museum and MSF and the situation with health insurance. Surely if the Swiss were so willing to donate to humanitarian causes abroad they would be willing to ensue that everyone in Switzerland had reasonable access to quality health care, I thought. Over the next few days I pursued more conversations with the Swiss of Vaud regarding health insurance and health care.
One older man I spoke with, an invalid who could no longer work for medical reasons, explained that the state provided him with a stipend of 2,000 francs per month- a little more than 2/3 of the monthly rent for his family home. While he had hoped to receive government assistance for medical insurance, which for the elderly is very high, he was turned down because he has a phone, electricity, an apartment, and other things that could be liquidated into cash if he was actually in need. He was not, according to the system, in need of any financial assistance.
An unnamed women I spoke to outside of the Migros in Nyon also had a few criticisms for the health care system in Vaud. She explained that the rich as well as the poor have the same insurance rates, and reminded me that in different cantons such as Geneva, the situation is completely different. Despite the fact that many insurance companies are private and ought to be competitive with each other and government insurance, she said, average workers who live on less than 4,000 francs per month were setting prices alongside bankers who take in over 200,000 francs per year. These high incomes, she believed, contribute to insurance companies making profits while still charging painfully high rates. Another man I spoke with regarding my second observation journal entry, Laurent, felt that the insurance rates in Vaud reflect Vaud's relatively high income, and explained that in a region with a lower income, insurance rates are also relatively low.
Interpretation:
These varied perspectives and experiences helped me form interpretations of the situations I had directly observed and indirectly learned about though conversations. The humanitarian reputation of Switzerland is undeniable- but what is questionable is the validity of this reputation. While the Swiss could be unusually compassionate and concerned with the health and wellbeing of all humans, the reputation could have also been created by the nation's simple and efficient neutrality. Neutrality, which has kept Switzerland out of wars that could have potentially destroyed the country, has also made it incredibly hospitable to international organizations of all kind, many of which focus on humanitarianism. It is possible that the reputation of the Swiss as a humanitarian nation could be created by the activities of organizations more so than the actual values of the population.
In addition, the way I perceived MSF's statement that most of their funding comes from private donors could have been incorrect. MSF admits that they limit the amount of funding they receive from institutions to less than 20%. If this is true, most of their budget would HAVE to come from donors whether the donors were usually generous or not. The doubling of the budget as well is hard to judge without considering the economic growth of the country over the last four years as well as donor trends in other MSF nations.
Health care in Switzerland is open to multiple interpretations as well. Mandatory health insurance as well as a choice between state or private insurance policies could be a sign of a population who values both the competitive marketplace as well as a minimum government standard. A concern for equality is also reflected in the requirement that insurance policies at a certain premium must cost the same for individuals of the same age group, regardless of their sex or state of health. For full time workers, this insurance may not be overly costly at all; it also may not be the responsibility of the health care system in Switzerland to react when full time work is difficult to find. We must also recognize the quality of even basic Swiss health care, which is some of the best in the world, and thus bound to be more expensive than lower quality care. While my initial observation suggested a possible contradiction between the image and reality of the Swiss in terms of health care, under closer inspection I can see that there may be no contradiction at all. In fact, I may have misinterpreted and mis-evaluated my original observation, due to both preconceptions as well as my sometimes overly sympathetic ear.
Evaluation:
Is there a contradiction between the humanitarian reputation of Switzerland and the health care system?
After a careful examination of my experiences and conversations, I feel that there is no contradiction between health care in Switzerland (Vaud specifically) and the humanitarian reputation. The health care system could be improved in some ways: subsidized insurance for low income and part time workers, requiring insurance companies to make their records public, or other strategies from neighboring cantons could be implemented to reduce costs for those without a banker's salary. In a way, however, these types of policies themselves would be contrary to the typical Swiss way, where everything has a price.
We must also keep in mind that the humanitarian reputation Switzerland carries stems mostly from Geneva and the organizations that reside in that canton, not necessarily from the people of Vaud. I take special note here of one interviewee, who explained that the health care system is more accessible in the canton of Geneva than in Vaud. Therefore, I believe the humanitarian reputation is not nearly as Swiss as I previously thought, and is in fact more specific to the canton of Geneva and the organizations present.
The idea of charity organizations and humanitarian aid that helps the poor with donations of food, money, education, etc, seems to run perfectly in line with the capitalist system in Switzerland. In Switzerland, market competition is utilized in hopes of increasing the choices and availability of insurance for the Swiss, and is complemented by state insurance. Charity donations and aid, rather than a state imposed tax or redistribution of wealth, are a free market way of dealing with the problems of poverty. Many Swiss make charitable donations to programs like MSF, which I believe shows to a certain degree that the Swiss believe in helping those who are unable to help themselves. With an average income of over $40,000/year and a history of independence, however, perhaps voters in Vaud believe that they are for the most part able to take care of themselves, and therefore not in need of strong state assistance. Curiously from a U.S. perspective, the way health insurance works is decided by Swiss voters rather than politicians and economists, and this brings up more questions that will be answered in my observation journal regarding direct democracy in Vaud.
Introduction:
One morning, my colleagues and I were given a tour of the International Red Cross and Red Crescent Museum in Geneva Switzerland. My experiences at the Red Cross left me feeling emotionally vulnerable; the museum's visualizations and symbolic representation of tragedies tugged painfully at my heartstrings, yet I felt impatient for my own opportunities to positively affect the world. As I sat down to a dinner with my Swiss host family that night, the day's emotions and memories continued to pluck and pull at my consciousness, distracting me from the conversation. My attention was completely diverted, however, when my host sister Justine began describing her meeting with a health insurance representative earlier in the afternoon. I was shocked when Justine shared her monthly quote for basic health insurance, even more so when she explained that she had to pay extra for “luxuries” like a private room separate from vulnerable children and elderly. Our ensuing conversation spurred a question within me that forms the basic prompt for this journal entry: Is there a contradiction between the humanitarian reputation of Switzerland and the health care system?
Description:
Initial Observations and Ensuing Dialogs
Before coming to Switzerland, I was aware that the country was internationally recognized for its neutrality and its acceptance and promotion of humanitarianism. Not only do international organizations such as the United Nations and the World Trade Organizations have seats in Geneva, but also a plethora of non-governmental humanitarian groups. I also held a firm belief that the Swiss way was the best way, and that undoubtedly the system in Switzerland was conductive to the people's kind and generous natures. I felt certain that the care and compassion represented by the organizations in Geneva would be reflected in the politics and society of the Swiss.
These preconceptions were re-enforced for me by both our conversation with representatives from the Swiss operational headquarters of Médecins Sans Frontières (MSF) as well as the Red Cross tour. The presentation by a representative from MSF revealed that the humanitarian aid organization was funded almost entirely by private donations, with half of the overall budget coming from Swiss donors and another third coming from fund raising activities within the country. The speaker also pointed out that the budget for the Swiss MSF had doubled between 2004 and 2008, reflecting a huge increase in the amount and/or number of Swiss donors who contributed to the aid organization.
While we had discussed the significance of the Red Cross in terms of the overall humanitarian movement while in Paris at Médecins du Monde, I did not begin to fully appreciate its place in the international dialog regarding humanitarianism until our Red Cross tour. The Red Cross Museum uses powerful symbolic representation to present their ideas and history, which for me brought their stories to life. A small concrete cell allowed us to feel like isolated prisoners, simulated land mines in the floor reminded us how easily they could be mistaken for toys, and vast towers of index cards represented lost prisoners of war and their families' desperation. The history of the Red Cross is rooted in Switzerland, where it was founded by a Swiss businessman named Henri Dunant, and from which the Geneva Conventions were born. Due to my past experiences with Amnesty International and my interest in humanitarianism, the Geneva Conventions hold incredible importance to me. Learning about the role of the Red Cross and the Swiss in their creation further increased my satisfaction with the Swiss themselves.
The same night over dinner, my Swiss sister Justine lamented about her problems with health insurance. Neither Justine nor her sister, both teachers, she explained, have succeeded in finding a full time job, therefore each of them make only a portion of an average teacher's salary. Despite their shortage in funds, they still must pay for the mandatory health insurance, which at the most basic in Vaud costs about 280 francs per month. To get extra benefits, such as a private room or access to more diverse medications and remedies, they must pay even more per month.
Listening to Justine describe her situation- spending roughly 15-20% of her monthly salary on health insurance despite being young and healthy, I couldn't help but wonder if there was some sort of contradiction between what I had seen earlier at the Red Cross Museum and MSF and the situation with health insurance. Surely if the Swiss were so willing to donate to humanitarian causes abroad they would be willing to ensue that everyone in Switzerland had reasonable access to quality health care, I thought. Over the next few days I pursued more conversations with the Swiss of Vaud regarding health insurance and health care.
One older man I spoke with, an invalid who could no longer work for medical reasons, explained that the state provided him with a stipend of 2,000 francs per month- a little more than 2/3 of the monthly rent for his family home. While he had hoped to receive government assistance for medical insurance, which for the elderly is very high, he was turned down because he has a phone, electricity, an apartment, and other things that could be liquidated into cash if he was actually in need. He was not, according to the system, in need of any financial assistance.
An unnamed women I spoke to outside of the Migros in Nyon also had a few criticisms for the health care system in Vaud. She explained that the rich as well as the poor have the same insurance rates, and reminded me that in different cantons such as Geneva, the situation is completely different. Despite the fact that many insurance companies are private and ought to be competitive with each other and government insurance, she said, average workers who live on less than 4,000 francs per month were setting prices alongside bankers who take in over 200,000 francs per year. These high incomes, she believed, contribute to insurance companies making profits while still charging painfully high rates. Another man I spoke with regarding my second observation journal entry, Laurent, felt that the insurance rates in Vaud reflect Vaud's relatively high income, and explained that in a region with a lower income, insurance rates are also relatively low.
Interpretation:
These varied perspectives and experiences helped me form interpretations of the situations I had directly observed and indirectly learned about though conversations. The humanitarian reputation of Switzerland is undeniable- but what is questionable is the validity of this reputation. While the Swiss could be unusually compassionate and concerned with the health and wellbeing of all humans, the reputation could have also been created by the nation's simple and efficient neutrality. Neutrality, which has kept Switzerland out of wars that could have potentially destroyed the country, has also made it incredibly hospitable to international organizations of all kind, many of which focus on humanitarianism. It is possible that the reputation of the Swiss as a humanitarian nation could be created by the activities of organizations more so than the actual values of the population.
In addition, the way I perceived MSF's statement that most of their funding comes from private donors could have been incorrect. MSF admits that they limit the amount of funding they receive from institutions to less than 20%. If this is true, most of their budget would HAVE to come from donors whether the donors were usually generous or not. The doubling of the budget as well is hard to judge without considering the economic growth of the country over the last four years as well as donor trends in other MSF nations.
Health care in Switzerland is open to multiple interpretations as well. Mandatory health insurance as well as a choice between state or private insurance policies could be a sign of a population who values both the competitive marketplace as well as a minimum government standard. A concern for equality is also reflected in the requirement that insurance policies at a certain premium must cost the same for individuals of the same age group, regardless of their sex or state of health. For full time workers, this insurance may not be overly costly at all; it also may not be the responsibility of the health care system in Switzerland to react when full time work is difficult to find. We must also recognize the quality of even basic Swiss health care, which is some of the best in the world, and thus bound to be more expensive than lower quality care. While my initial observation suggested a possible contradiction between the image and reality of the Swiss in terms of health care, under closer inspection I can see that there may be no contradiction at all. In fact, I may have misinterpreted and mis-evaluated my original observation, due to both preconceptions as well as my sometimes overly sympathetic ear.
Evaluation:
Is there a contradiction between the humanitarian reputation of Switzerland and the health care system?
After a careful examination of my experiences and conversations, I feel that there is no contradiction between health care in Switzerland (Vaud specifically) and the humanitarian reputation. The health care system could be improved in some ways: subsidized insurance for low income and part time workers, requiring insurance companies to make their records public, or other strategies from neighboring cantons could be implemented to reduce costs for those without a banker's salary. In a way, however, these types of policies themselves would be contrary to the typical Swiss way, where everything has a price.
We must also keep in mind that the humanitarian reputation Switzerland carries stems mostly from Geneva and the organizations that reside in that canton, not necessarily from the people of Vaud. I take special note here of one interviewee, who explained that the health care system is more accessible in the canton of Geneva than in Vaud. Therefore, I believe the humanitarian reputation is not nearly as Swiss as I previously thought, and is in fact more specific to the canton of Geneva and the organizations present.
The idea of charity organizations and humanitarian aid that helps the poor with donations of food, money, education, etc, seems to run perfectly in line with the capitalist system in Switzerland. In Switzerland, market competition is utilized in hopes of increasing the choices and availability of insurance for the Swiss, and is complemented by state insurance. Charity donations and aid, rather than a state imposed tax or redistribution of wealth, are a free market way of dealing with the problems of poverty. Many Swiss make charitable donations to programs like MSF, which I believe shows to a certain degree that the Swiss believe in helping those who are unable to help themselves. With an average income of over $40,000/year and a history of independence, however, perhaps voters in Vaud believe that they are for the most part able to take care of themselves, and therefore not in need of strong state assistance. Curiously from a U.S. perspective, the way health insurance works is decided by Swiss voters rather than politicians and economists, and this brings up more questions that will be answered in my observation journal regarding direct democracy in Vaud.
Friday, September 12, 2008
The Red Cross
Today we took a tour of the Museum of the International Committee of the Red Cross. The museum here in Geneva is really special- absolutely everything in this museum is dripping with symbolism, from the height of the walls to the unfinished ceiling, from the way it's hidden underground to the various rooms and cells you can explore. The museum itself is a piece of art- it is incredibly stylized, and everything holds meaning.
What is so special about the Red Cross? Before coming to Europe, I would have said it was an aid organization just like any other, perhaps older. But the Red Cross is so much more than that- I feel that it is safe to say that the Red Cross pioneered modern forms of humanitarianism. It is also treated almost like an entity, with an international respect and deference that a regular NGO doesn't receive.
The battle of Solferino (Italy and France v Austria) in 1859 yielded over 20 km of horrifically maimed and injured bodies. A wealthy, industrious Swiss businessman named Henri Dunant came to the battlefront seeking permission from Napolean III to access some French resources; upon seeing the traumatic battlefront, Henri's life completely changed. He returned to Geneva a new man, sending his account of the battle to leaders around the world, calling for a meeting on the horrors of war. From his ensuing lifetime of charity, hard work, and motivation stemmed the organization of the Red Cross, and, in my opinion more importantly, the Geneva Conventions themselves. He died running from debt collectors, denying the prize money he was awarded by the Nobel Peace Prize, among others, and sending the money instead to the Red Cross.
The Geneva Conventions are one of the main reasons the Red Cross stands apart from other aid agencies. The Red Cross essentially created the Geneva conventions, triggering countries to respect medical workers, armies, navies, prisoners of war, and civilians during times of war. Today the Geneva conventions are often treated like the grand rules- perhaps the U.S. and other nations break them from time to time, but it is generally agreed that they shouldn't be broken. The international legitimacy of the Red Cross has gained it a special place in terms of the international criminal court: no Red Cross member can be forced to testify. Today the Red Cross's neutrality grants it access to prisoner camps, prisons, and other sites around the world that no other human rights organization has access to. Even Nazi Germany eventually allowed the Red Cross access to its death camps- on the condition that they could not leave until the end of the war. Gallantly, 10 Red Cross delegates went to the death camps anyway.
The Red Cross, aside from providing essential medical care, documents the conditions of POW's, sends them supplemental food, has prison conditioned improved, connects victims of war with their families and loved ones, etc etc etc. They provide medical aid, but also mental aid, repairing families and creating new ones. After Rwanda, they connected thousands of lost children with their families and with adoptive parents, and those who were still unclaimed were assisted in forming families with each other.
Neutrality in an aid organization is a touchy issue for me. For the Red Cross, they focus on helping everyone regardless of their demographics or politics, and they remain more or less silent about who is right or wrong. This enables them to enter into places where no other aid agencies can go, which is important for accessing victims who are otherwise out of sight. My issue with organizations like the Red Cross, or like Doctors without Borders, is that they say they want to help without pointing out who is wrong, without substituting for what government should be doing on its own, without shooting for big changes.
Well, I would say this accomplishes very little in the big picture. Yes, they are keeping people from enduring torturous conditions they would have faced otherwise, and yes they are helping individuals find their families, and yes, they are providing proper medical care for wounded people. But they are, to me, cleaning up a mess, not asking why the mess is there in the first place.
For example, we talked to some people from the UN about malnutrition the other day. They said they like to distribute the food aid necessary to help children overcome malnutrition to keep them alive, and THATS ALL. The rest of the job- finding them jobs, finding a stable food source, etc, that's the government's role. I think that in cases where children are malnourished, where medical care is not provided for citizens, etc, it is already the case that the government cannot or will not do its job, and by keeping people on the brink of life rather than letting them die, the problem is only exasperated. It may even, in fact, compound the problem by leaving more jobless, hungry, resentful people in a country that is not functioning. I'm not saying that aid agencies should let people die, obviously, nor do I think they should attempt to tell the government how to behave to save its own people.
Instead, I feel that aid agencies should address the root causes of disease, hunger, and poverty with grassroots solutions. People are starving. Okay, well instead of asking government to form better political and economic strategies, instead of giving the worst cases just enough care to keep them from dying, why don't agencies focus on providing people with the tools, the animals, the seeds, the education, the technology to feed themselves?
There are not two ways of going about change- band aids or government restructuring. Pilot programs implemented on a small household or village basis have the ability to actually work, be manageable, be implemented without needing a government okay, and are self propagating, spreading if they are successful.
Should we let that starving child die? Well no, not if we can help it, but so many agencies seem to focus on that state of emergency at the expense of structural change rather than incorporating the two. So far, Medecins du Monde is the only organization we have explored that really addressing the short term and the long term in a way that is truly beneficial to people living in developing nations as a whole. Perhaps I am not compassionate enough about individual people? Maybe I still have more to learn.
The red cross is not a normal NGO- while others are worried about impartiality and effectiveness, about getting money without accepting association with a country, the Red Cross seems to have a status more like that of an IO like the UN or WTO: it is an entity that affects politics on a different scale than groups like Amnesty International.
What is so special about the Red Cross? Before coming to Europe, I would have said it was an aid organization just like any other, perhaps older. But the Red Cross is so much more than that- I feel that it is safe to say that the Red Cross pioneered modern forms of humanitarianism. It is also treated almost like an entity, with an international respect and deference that a regular NGO doesn't receive.
The battle of Solferino (Italy and France v Austria) in 1859 yielded over 20 km of horrifically maimed and injured bodies. A wealthy, industrious Swiss businessman named Henri Dunant came to the battlefront seeking permission from Napolean III to access some French resources; upon seeing the traumatic battlefront, Henri's life completely changed. He returned to Geneva a new man, sending his account of the battle to leaders around the world, calling for a meeting on the horrors of war. From his ensuing lifetime of charity, hard work, and motivation stemmed the organization of the Red Cross, and, in my opinion more importantly, the Geneva Conventions themselves. He died running from debt collectors, denying the prize money he was awarded by the Nobel Peace Prize, among others, and sending the money instead to the Red Cross.
The Geneva Conventions are one of the main reasons the Red Cross stands apart from other aid agencies. The Red Cross essentially created the Geneva conventions, triggering countries to respect medical workers, armies, navies, prisoners of war, and civilians during times of war. Today the Geneva conventions are often treated like the grand rules- perhaps the U.S. and other nations break them from time to time, but it is generally agreed that they shouldn't be broken. The international legitimacy of the Red Cross has gained it a special place in terms of the international criminal court: no Red Cross member can be forced to testify. Today the Red Cross's neutrality grants it access to prisoner camps, prisons, and other sites around the world that no other human rights organization has access to. Even Nazi Germany eventually allowed the Red Cross access to its death camps- on the condition that they could not leave until the end of the war. Gallantly, 10 Red Cross delegates went to the death camps anyway.
The Red Cross, aside from providing essential medical care, documents the conditions of POW's, sends them supplemental food, has prison conditioned improved, connects victims of war with their families and loved ones, etc etc etc. They provide medical aid, but also mental aid, repairing families and creating new ones. After Rwanda, they connected thousands of lost children with their families and with adoptive parents, and those who were still unclaimed were assisted in forming families with each other.
Neutrality in an aid organization is a touchy issue for me. For the Red Cross, they focus on helping everyone regardless of their demographics or politics, and they remain more or less silent about who is right or wrong. This enables them to enter into places where no other aid agencies can go, which is important for accessing victims who are otherwise out of sight. My issue with organizations like the Red Cross, or like Doctors without Borders, is that they say they want to help without pointing out who is wrong, without substituting for what government should be doing on its own, without shooting for big changes.
Well, I would say this accomplishes very little in the big picture. Yes, they are keeping people from enduring torturous conditions they would have faced otherwise, and yes they are helping individuals find their families, and yes, they are providing proper medical care for wounded people. But they are, to me, cleaning up a mess, not asking why the mess is there in the first place.
For example, we talked to some people from the UN about malnutrition the other day. They said they like to distribute the food aid necessary to help children overcome malnutrition to keep them alive, and THATS ALL. The rest of the job- finding them jobs, finding a stable food source, etc, that's the government's role. I think that in cases where children are malnourished, where medical care is not provided for citizens, etc, it is already the case that the government cannot or will not do its job, and by keeping people on the brink of life rather than letting them die, the problem is only exasperated. It may even, in fact, compound the problem by leaving more jobless, hungry, resentful people in a country that is not functioning. I'm not saying that aid agencies should let people die, obviously, nor do I think they should attempt to tell the government how to behave to save its own people.
Instead, I feel that aid agencies should address the root causes of disease, hunger, and poverty with grassroots solutions. People are starving. Okay, well instead of asking government to form better political and economic strategies, instead of giving the worst cases just enough care to keep them from dying, why don't agencies focus on providing people with the tools, the animals, the seeds, the education, the technology to feed themselves?
There are not two ways of going about change- band aids or government restructuring. Pilot programs implemented on a small household or village basis have the ability to actually work, be manageable, be implemented without needing a government okay, and are self propagating, spreading if they are successful.
Should we let that starving child die? Well no, not if we can help it, but so many agencies seem to focus on that state of emergency at the expense of structural change rather than incorporating the two. So far, Medecins du Monde is the only organization we have explored that really addressing the short term and the long term in a way that is truly beneficial to people living in developing nations as a whole. Perhaps I am not compassionate enough about individual people? Maybe I still have more to learn.
The red cross is not a normal NGO- while others are worried about impartiality and effectiveness, about getting money without accepting association with a country, the Red Cross seems to have a status more like that of an IO like the UN or WTO: it is an entity that affects politics on a different scale than groups like Amnesty International.
Sunday, September 7, 2008
traveling alone
After my program (and frequently during the program) I will be traveling alone through Europe... I'm not big on tourist attractions- for example, I wasn't really interested in seeing la Tour Eiffel up close and personal. Instead, I would like to talk to locals, make friends, go to clubs, dance, cook a breakfast in a communal kitchen with others, and just have fun. The problem is, I am so morbidly shy and awkward that I am afraid I will not be able to communicate with other people, particularly in Italy, Prague, Berlin, or Austria, and will thus spend every day wandering lost and every night be in bed by 8:30pm. I really don't know if I will be able to befriend random strangers and be invited along with them. For this, I worry. If my independent travel is a waste, I will feel terrible about my own lack of communicate skills.
swiss family structure
Switzerland, while being very progressive in terms of conservation, politics, etc, is actually significantly behind the rest of the "developed" world in terms of gender equity. Women here were among some of the last to gain the right to vote or to put it into practice, and sexism is still very rampant in the society. Societal structures, for example a break in the school day for children to return home for lunch, further work against women by requiring them to be at home monday-friday. One way I have seen this is through family dynamics. The mother in my host family works, as do her two daughters, while the father remains home due to extreme medical circumstances. The mother cooks three meals a day for her family, cleans, grocery shops, and does everyone's laundry, despite being a full time hospital worker. Having this mother cook breakfast, lunch, and dinner as well as require that I hand my laundry over to her makes me feel extremely awkward- she is so kind and giving, but to the point where she does our work for us. Her daughters never wash their own clothes despite being teachers and 24 and 26 years old, and they don't know how to cook. Because mother has always prepared the meals, their father told me, neither of the girls have ever learned to prepare food for themselves! This seems so strange to me, this traditional family setting, especially because my mom always encouraged independence so strongly.
Friday, September 5, 2008
humanitarianism and le roi lion
So I just finished reading two articles that I really enjoyed. The first, a UN report on diverging growth and development published in the 2006 World Economic and Social Survey (06). This report discussed a lot of what we cover in IPE- ie, how globalization affects development, specifically the divide between the developed and developing nations. Our classroom readings and discussions have been relatively shallow, however, when compared to this report. I have never had such an engaging and detailed description of foreign direct investment, private investments, different domestic strategies for integrating the benefits of trade, infrastructure, etc etc. It took everything we have ever covered in college and dove significantly deeper into each subject, deconstructing them to discover where exactly problems lie, and backing it up with sound evidence. It took actions that in IPE we dismiss as ineffective and counterproductive and showed me where and why they are problematic. Just have to say, it was excellent, and did a good job of presenting a well rounded viewpoint on development. If you are interested in development/econ/poverty, check it out.
Moving on to a shorter and more easily explainable article that I also found really interesting... Appearing in Foreign Affairs, David Rieff's "Humanitarianism in Crisis" discussed a recent shift in humanitarianism, as well as its implications. In the good old days of aid work, neutrality was key. Organizations were supposedly non political and tried to help everyone, everywhere, for the simple fact that they were people. This could mean assisting victims of natural disasters, victims in civil wars or conflicts, where ever. Their motivations were diverse, whether compassion or Christian duty. The focus of the aid was simply that- to aid. The only time they would pull out would be if there was a loss of funding or if they were doing more harm than good, such as making people targets by providing them with supplies.
By the end of the 90's, these humanitarians were become disheartened and disillusioned by the seeming ineffectiveness of their work, and many were swept up in new humanitarianism. This "new" humanitarianism is built on the principle of human rights; if a government is not protecting the rights of its people, the aid groups have an obligation to provide for them. To address the base causes of health problems appeared more effective than the relief of the previous century.
As governments and militias became more violent toward the aid workers, who espoused the rules of the UN and Geneva conventions, they began calling for peacekeepers like NATO forces to assure their safety and transport. By essentially militarizing aid, relief work quickly became highly political. When a nation or military force goes in, it goes in to win, which invites total violence and destruction of the enemy. This, tied into the fact that many aid agencies are unable to refuse donation contracts from organizations like the UN, makes them all the more politicized. By focusing on human rights and the contractual obligations between government and their people, aid organizations try to affect the root causes of the issues they treat, such as poverty and infrastructure. They also create a group of people who are "not worth" aiding- people who, if they were aided, would subtract from the overall political goal. This author argues passionately that humanitarianism has lost the neutrality that made it so acceptable and beautiful before- perhaps it was ineffective in the grand scheme, but it was present. Today, politicized aid workers are targets of violence. Of course, the article goes much deeper than this into a variety of issues regarding aid, but I found the dichotomy between old school neutral aid agencies and new age politicized agencies to be really interesting.
Which is better? Well it depends. Some aid agencies provide only band aids- food, medical care, education, sanitation, etc where it is needed most. This saves lives, and often helps prevent problems like disease and malnutrition from spreading through a population. Other agencies attempt to initiate plans and projects to create sustainable systems of self help with the potential to influence politics. Honestly, I believe both of these are necessary, and perhaps agency specialization is in the best interest of everyone to prevent overlap that wastes resources; we cannot forget to keep our efforts coordinated, however. The author argues that above all aid must be neutral, or else it is indeed not humanitarianism, but instead a political agenda often accompanied by guns and NATO troops. It's neutrality or nothing.
David concludes the article by saying, "So many people, including relief workers, now speak of 'mere' charity, 'mere' humanitarianism- as if coping with a dishonorable world justly, and a cruel world with kindness, were not honor enough."
And on a different subject entirely, I watched le Roi Lion tonight (the lion king) in French and was infinitely pleased, because it is my favorite movie and I was able to understand some dialogue.
Moving on to a shorter and more easily explainable article that I also found really interesting... Appearing in Foreign Affairs, David Rieff's "Humanitarianism in Crisis" discussed a recent shift in humanitarianism, as well as its implications. In the good old days of aid work, neutrality was key. Organizations were supposedly non political and tried to help everyone, everywhere, for the simple fact that they were people. This could mean assisting victims of natural disasters, victims in civil wars or conflicts, where ever. Their motivations were diverse, whether compassion or Christian duty. The focus of the aid was simply that- to aid. The only time they would pull out would be if there was a loss of funding or if they were doing more harm than good, such as making people targets by providing them with supplies.
By the end of the 90's, these humanitarians were become disheartened and disillusioned by the seeming ineffectiveness of their work, and many were swept up in new humanitarianism. This "new" humanitarianism is built on the principle of human rights; if a government is not protecting the rights of its people, the aid groups have an obligation to provide for them. To address the base causes of health problems appeared more effective than the relief of the previous century.
As governments and militias became more violent toward the aid workers, who espoused the rules of the UN and Geneva conventions, they began calling for peacekeepers like NATO forces to assure their safety and transport. By essentially militarizing aid, relief work quickly became highly political. When a nation or military force goes in, it goes in to win, which invites total violence and destruction of the enemy. This, tied into the fact that many aid agencies are unable to refuse donation contracts from organizations like the UN, makes them all the more politicized. By focusing on human rights and the contractual obligations between government and their people, aid organizations try to affect the root causes of the issues they treat, such as poverty and infrastructure. They also create a group of people who are "not worth" aiding- people who, if they were aided, would subtract from the overall political goal. This author argues passionately that humanitarianism has lost the neutrality that made it so acceptable and beautiful before- perhaps it was ineffective in the grand scheme, but it was present. Today, politicized aid workers are targets of violence. Of course, the article goes much deeper than this into a variety of issues regarding aid, but I found the dichotomy between old school neutral aid agencies and new age politicized agencies to be really interesting.
Which is better? Well it depends. Some aid agencies provide only band aids- food, medical care, education, sanitation, etc where it is needed most. This saves lives, and often helps prevent problems like disease and malnutrition from spreading through a population. Other agencies attempt to initiate plans and projects to create sustainable systems of self help with the potential to influence politics. Honestly, I believe both of these are necessary, and perhaps agency specialization is in the best interest of everyone to prevent overlap that wastes resources; we cannot forget to keep our efforts coordinated, however. The author argues that above all aid must be neutral, or else it is indeed not humanitarianism, but instead a political agenda often accompanied by guns and NATO troops. It's neutrality or nothing.
David concludes the article by saying, "So many people, including relief workers, now speak of 'mere' charity, 'mere' humanitarianism- as if coping with a dishonorable world justly, and a cruel world with kindness, were not honor enough."
And on a different subject entirely, I watched le Roi Lion tonight (the lion king) in French and was infinitely pleased, because it is my favorite movie and I was able to understand some dialogue.
Thursday, September 4, 2008
sarah palin
First things first: The criticisms I make about Sarah Palin here are the same criticisms I would make about a man running for VP when he had a disabled infant at home. Also, being abroad during the Rnc, I have gained an interesting perspective on the "issue" regarding Sarah Palin's pregnant daughter. The BBC, the French news, and the international newspapers have been CONSTANTLY running stories- up to seven in one issue- about the pregnancy and what it means. Specifically, they are commending the politicians for not using the pregnancy to degrade Sarah's moral fiber, which of course, they hint, is now very controversial.
The fact that they even point this out to me is absurd. In no way should her daughter's actions and choices affect her own moral standing, and even more so, a pregnancy outside of marriage should not be considered by the world to be a terrible, morally bad thing! It is not instantly a tragedy and a sign of bad parenting. The international press is praising America so wholeheartedly for overlooking and forgiving this terrible slight- I don't see this as a slight on Sarah Palin. Her young daughter's out of wedlock pregnancy should not even be mentioned on the news because it is simply not news.
What I would point out about Sarah in terms of morals and motherhood, however, is that she has a four month old infant with down syndrome and is signing up for a job that could potentially remove her from that child's life for eight years. Is it right for anyone to abandon their infant child for eight years? Is that a sign of a good mother, or even a person who is capable of making responsible choices? Honestly if I were planning to have a baby, I would not do it when i KNEW I would not be able to raise the child or form a bond with it. I totally support working mothers, especially those who have to work to feed their children. But when a wealthy woman chooses to be famous instead of forming meaningful connections with her creations just because she feels like it- that is really sad. She could be a governor and still see her children on nights and weekends. She could be a senator and still see them for part of the year. But vice president? I think it is irresponsible and selfish to saddle children with abandonment issues in exchange for power. And if McCain is unfortunately assassinated or dies in some sort of tragedy? She would be president, and with a special needs child who requires near 24 hour care and to which she could give virtually none. Regardless of her politics, her personal choices show a clear lack of conscious and compassion for the well being of others, in my opinion.
Now let's see what others think about Palin, her "tax cutting" history, her casual admittance that she "hasn't thought much about Iraq", etc.
*
*
*
*
Opinion
Palin: Wrong Woman, Wrong Message
Thursday 04 September 200
by: Gloria Steinem, The Los Angeles Times
photo
Gloria Steinem speaks out. (Photo: www.iabolish.org)
Sarah Palin shares nothing but a chromosome with Hillary Clinton. She is Phyllis Schlafly, only younger.
Here's the good news: Women have become so politically powerful that even the anti-feminist right wing - the folks with a headlock on the Republican Party - are trying to appease the gender gap with a first-ever female vice president. We owe this to women - and to many men too - who have picketed, gone on hunger strikes or confronted violence at the polls so women can vote. We owe it to Shirley Chisholm, who first took the "white-male-only" sign off the White House, and to Hillary Rodham Clinton, who hung in there through ridicule and misogyny to win 18 million votes.
But here is even better news: It won't work. This isn't the first time a boss has picked an unqualified woman just because she agrees with him and opposes everything most other women want and need. Feminism has never been about getting a job for one woman. It's about making life more fair for women everywhere. It's not about a piece of the existing pie; there are too many of us for that. It's about baking a new pie.
Selecting Sarah Palin, who was touted all summer by Rush Limbaugh, is no way to attract most women, including die-hard Clinton supporters. Palin shares nothing but a chromosome with Clinton. Her down-home, divisive and deceptive speech did nothing to cosmeticize a Republican convention that has more than twice as many male delegates as female, a presidential candidate who is owned and operated by the right wing and a platform that opposes pretty much everything Clinton's candidacy stood for - and that Barack Obama's still does. To vote in protest for McCain/Palin would be like saying, "Somebody stole my shoes, so I'll amputate my legs."
This is not to beat up on Palin. I defend her right to be wrong, even on issues that matter most to me. I regret that people say she can't do the job because she has children in need of care, especially if they wouldn't say the same about a father. I get no pleasure from imagining her in the spotlight on national and foreign policy issues about which she has zero background, with one month to learn to compete with Sen. Joe Biden's 37 years' experience.
Palin has been honest about what she doesn't know. When asked last month about the vice presidency, she said, "I still can't answer that question until someone answers for me: What is it exactly that the VP does every day?" When asked about Iraq, she said, "I haven't really focused much on the war in Iraq."
She was elected governor largely because the incumbent was unpopular, and she's won over Alaskans mostly by using unprecedented oil wealth to give a $1,200 rebate to every resident. Now she is being praised by McCain's campaign as a tax cutter, despite the fact that Alaska has no state income or sales tax. Perhaps McCain has opposed affirmative action for so long that he doesn't know it's about inviting more people to meet standards, not lowering them. Or perhaps McCain is following the Bush administration habit, as in the Justice Department, of putting a job candidate's views on "God, guns and gays" ahead of competence. The difference is that McCain is filling a job one 72-year-old heartbeat away from the presidency.
So let's be clear: The culprit is John McCain. He may have chosen Palin out of change-envy, or a belief that women can't tell the difference between form and content, but the main motive was to please right-wing ideologues; the same ones who nixed anyone who is now or ever has been a supporter of reproductive freedom. If that were not the case, McCain could have chosen a woman who knows what a vice president does and who has thought about Iraq; someone like Texas Sen. Kay Bailey Hutchison or Sen. Olympia Snowe of Maine. McCain could have taken a baby step away from right-wing patriarchs who determine his actions, right down to opposing the Violence Against Women Act.
Palin's value to those patriarchs is clear: She opposes just about every issue that women support by a majority or plurality. She believes that creationism should be taught in public schools but disbelieves global warming; she opposes gun control but supports government control of women's wombs; she opposes stem cell research but approves "abstinence-only" programs, which increase unwanted births, sexually transmitted diseases and abortions; she tried to use taxpayers' millions for a state program to shoot wolves from the air but didn't spend enough money to fix a state school system with the lowest high-school graduation rate in the nation; she runs with a candidate who opposes the Fair Pay Act but supports $500 million in subsidies for a natural gas pipeline across Alaska; she supports drilling in the Arctic National Wildlife Reserve, though even McCain has opted for the lesser evil of offshore drilling. She is Phyllis Schlafly, only younger.
I don't doubt her sincerity. As a lifetime member of the National Rifle Assn., she doesn't just support killing animals from helicopters, she does it herself. She doesn't just talk about increasing the use of fossil fuels but puts a coal-burning power plant in her own small town. She doesn't just echo McCain's pledge to criminalize abortion by overturning Roe vs. Wade, she says that if one of her daughters were impregnated by rape or incest, she should bear the child. She not only opposes reproductive freedom as a human right but implies that it dictates abortion, without saying that it also protects the right to have a child.
So far, the major new McCain supporter that Palin has attracted is James Dobson of Focus on the Family. Of course, for Dobson, "women are merely waiting for their husbands to assume leadership," so he may be voting for Palin's husband.
Being a hope-a-holic, however, I can see two long-term bipartisan gains from this contest.
Republicans may learn they can't appeal to right-wing patriarchs and most women at the same time. A loss in November could cause the centrist majority of Republicans to take back their party, which was the first to support the Equal Rights Amendment and should be the last to want to invite government into the wombs of women.
And American women, who suffer more because of having two full-time jobs than from any other single injustice, finally have support on a national stage from male leaders who know that women can't be equal outside the home until men are equal in it. Barack Obama and Joe Biden are campaigning on their belief that men should be, can be and want to be at home for their children.
This could be huge.
The fact that they even point this out to me is absurd. In no way should her daughter's actions and choices affect her own moral standing, and even more so, a pregnancy outside of marriage should not be considered by the world to be a terrible, morally bad thing! It is not instantly a tragedy and a sign of bad parenting. The international press is praising America so wholeheartedly for overlooking and forgiving this terrible slight- I don't see this as a slight on Sarah Palin. Her young daughter's out of wedlock pregnancy should not even be mentioned on the news because it is simply not news.
What I would point out about Sarah in terms of morals and motherhood, however, is that she has a four month old infant with down syndrome and is signing up for a job that could potentially remove her from that child's life for eight years. Is it right for anyone to abandon their infant child for eight years? Is that a sign of a good mother, or even a person who is capable of making responsible choices? Honestly if I were planning to have a baby, I would not do it when i KNEW I would not be able to raise the child or form a bond with it. I totally support working mothers, especially those who have to work to feed their children. But when a wealthy woman chooses to be famous instead of forming meaningful connections with her creations just because she feels like it- that is really sad. She could be a governor and still see her children on nights and weekends. She could be a senator and still see them for part of the year. But vice president? I think it is irresponsible and selfish to saddle children with abandonment issues in exchange for power. And if McCain is unfortunately assassinated or dies in some sort of tragedy? She would be president, and with a special needs child who requires near 24 hour care and to which she could give virtually none. Regardless of her politics, her personal choices show a clear lack of conscious and compassion for the well being of others, in my opinion.
Now let's see what others think about Palin, her "tax cutting" history, her casual admittance that she "hasn't thought much about Iraq", etc.
*
*
*
*
Opinion
Palin: Wrong Woman, Wrong Message
Thursday 04 September 200
by: Gloria Steinem, The Los Angeles Times
photo
Gloria Steinem speaks out. (Photo: www.iabolish.org)
Sarah Palin shares nothing but a chromosome with Hillary Clinton. She is Phyllis Schlafly, only younger.
Here's the good news: Women have become so politically powerful that even the anti-feminist right wing - the folks with a headlock on the Republican Party - are trying to appease the gender gap with a first-ever female vice president. We owe this to women - and to many men too - who have picketed, gone on hunger strikes or confronted violence at the polls so women can vote. We owe it to Shirley Chisholm, who first took the "white-male-only" sign off the White House, and to Hillary Rodham Clinton, who hung in there through ridicule and misogyny to win 18 million votes.
But here is even better news: It won't work. This isn't the first time a boss has picked an unqualified woman just because she agrees with him and opposes everything most other women want and need. Feminism has never been about getting a job for one woman. It's about making life more fair for women everywhere. It's not about a piece of the existing pie; there are too many of us for that. It's about baking a new pie.
Selecting Sarah Palin, who was touted all summer by Rush Limbaugh, is no way to attract most women, including die-hard Clinton supporters. Palin shares nothing but a chromosome with Clinton. Her down-home, divisive and deceptive speech did nothing to cosmeticize a Republican convention that has more than twice as many male delegates as female, a presidential candidate who is owned and operated by the right wing and a platform that opposes pretty much everything Clinton's candidacy stood for - and that Barack Obama's still does. To vote in protest for McCain/Palin would be like saying, "Somebody stole my shoes, so I'll amputate my legs."
This is not to beat up on Palin. I defend her right to be wrong, even on issues that matter most to me. I regret that people say she can't do the job because she has children in need of care, especially if they wouldn't say the same about a father. I get no pleasure from imagining her in the spotlight on national and foreign policy issues about which she has zero background, with one month to learn to compete with Sen. Joe Biden's 37 years' experience.
Palin has been honest about what she doesn't know. When asked last month about the vice presidency, she said, "I still can't answer that question until someone answers for me: What is it exactly that the VP does every day?" When asked about Iraq, she said, "I haven't really focused much on the war in Iraq."
She was elected governor largely because the incumbent was unpopular, and she's won over Alaskans mostly by using unprecedented oil wealth to give a $1,200 rebate to every resident. Now she is being praised by McCain's campaign as a tax cutter, despite the fact that Alaska has no state income or sales tax. Perhaps McCain has opposed affirmative action for so long that he doesn't know it's about inviting more people to meet standards, not lowering them. Or perhaps McCain is following the Bush administration habit, as in the Justice Department, of putting a job candidate's views on "God, guns and gays" ahead of competence. The difference is that McCain is filling a job one 72-year-old heartbeat away from the presidency.
So let's be clear: The culprit is John McCain. He may have chosen Palin out of change-envy, or a belief that women can't tell the difference between form and content, but the main motive was to please right-wing ideologues; the same ones who nixed anyone who is now or ever has been a supporter of reproductive freedom. If that were not the case, McCain could have chosen a woman who knows what a vice president does and who has thought about Iraq; someone like Texas Sen. Kay Bailey Hutchison or Sen. Olympia Snowe of Maine. McCain could have taken a baby step away from right-wing patriarchs who determine his actions, right down to opposing the Violence Against Women Act.
Palin's value to those patriarchs is clear: She opposes just about every issue that women support by a majority or plurality. She believes that creationism should be taught in public schools but disbelieves global warming; she opposes gun control but supports government control of women's wombs; she opposes stem cell research but approves "abstinence-only" programs, which increase unwanted births, sexually transmitted diseases and abortions; she tried to use taxpayers' millions for a state program to shoot wolves from the air but didn't spend enough money to fix a state school system with the lowest high-school graduation rate in the nation; she runs with a candidate who opposes the Fair Pay Act but supports $500 million in subsidies for a natural gas pipeline across Alaska; she supports drilling in the Arctic National Wildlife Reserve, though even McCain has opted for the lesser evil of offshore drilling. She is Phyllis Schlafly, only younger.
I don't doubt her sincerity. As a lifetime member of the National Rifle Assn., she doesn't just support killing animals from helicopters, she does it herself. She doesn't just talk about increasing the use of fossil fuels but puts a coal-burning power plant in her own small town. She doesn't just echo McCain's pledge to criminalize abortion by overturning Roe vs. Wade, she says that if one of her daughters were impregnated by rape or incest, she should bear the child. She not only opposes reproductive freedom as a human right but implies that it dictates abortion, without saying that it also protects the right to have a child.
So far, the major new McCain supporter that Palin has attracted is James Dobson of Focus on the Family. Of course, for Dobson, "women are merely waiting for their husbands to assume leadership," so he may be voting for Palin's husband.
Being a hope-a-holic, however, I can see two long-term bipartisan gains from this contest.
Republicans may learn they can't appeal to right-wing patriarchs and most women at the same time. A loss in November could cause the centrist majority of Republicans to take back their party, which was the first to support the Equal Rights Amendment and should be the last to want to invite government into the wombs of women.
And American women, who suffer more because of having two full-time jobs than from any other single injustice, finally have support on a national stage from male leaders who know that women can't be equal outside the home until men are equal in it. Barack Obama and Joe Biden are campaigning on their belief that men should be, can be and want to be at home for their children.
This could be huge.
sayonara first ammendment rights..
sub-media.tv
Pre-Emptive Strikes Against Protest at RNC
Tuesday 02 September 2008
by: Marjorie Cohn, t r u t h o u t | Report
In the months leading up to the Republican National Convention, the FBI-led Minneapolis Joint Terrorist Task Force actively recruited people to infiltrate vegan groups and other leftist organizations and report back about their activities. On May 21, the Minneapolis City Pages ran a recruiting story called "Moles Wanted." Law enforcement sought to pre-empt lawful protest against the policies of the Bush administration during the convention.
Since Friday, local police and sheriffs, working with the FBI, conducted pre-emptive searches, seizures and arrests. Glenn Greenwald described the targeting of protesters by "teams of 25-30 officers in riot gear, with semi-automatic weapons drawn, entering homes of those suspected of planning protests, handcuffing and forcing them to lay on the floor, while law enforcement officers searched the homes, seizing computers, journals, and political pamphlets." Journalists were detained at gunpoint and lawyers representing detainees were handcuffed at the scene.
"I was personally present and saw officers with riot gear and assault rifles, pump action shotguns," said Bruce Nestor, the president of the Minnesota chapter of the National Lawyers Guild, who is representing several of the protesters. "The neighbor of one of the houses had a gun pointed in her face when she walked out on her back porch to see what was going on. There were children in all of these houses, and children were held at gunpoint."
The raids targeted members of "Food Not Bombs," an antiwar, anti-authoritarian protest group that provides free vegetarian meals every week in hundreds of cities all over the world. They served meals to rescue workers at the World Trade Center after 9/11 and to nearly 20 communities in the Gulf region following Hurricane Katrina.
Also targeted, were members of I-Witness Video, a media watchdog group that monitors the police to protect civil liberties. The group worked with the National Lawyers Guild to gain the dismissal of charges or acquittals of about 400 of the 1,800 who were arrested during the 2004 Republican National Convention in New York. Pre-emptive policing was used at that time as well. Police infiltrated protest groups in advance of the convention.
Nestor said that no violence or illegality has taken place to justify the arrests. "Seizing boxes of political literature shows the motive of these raids was political," he said.
Further evidence of the political nature of the police action was the boarding up of the Convergence Center, where protesters had gathered, for unspecified code violations. St. Paul City Council member David Thune said, "Normally we only board up buildings that are vacant and ramshackle." Thune and fellow City Council member Elizabeth Glidden decried "actions that appear excessive and create an atmosphere of fear and intimidation for those who wish to exercise their First Amendment rights."
"So here we have a massive assault led by Federal Government law enforcement agencies on left-wing dissidents and protesters who have committed no acts of violence or illegality whatsoever, preceded by months-long espionage efforts to track what they do," Greenwald wrote on Salon.
Preventive detention violates the Fourth Amendment, which requires that warrants be supported by probable cause. protesters were charged with "conspiracy to commit riot," a rarely-used statute that is so vague, it is probably unconstitutional. Nestor said it "basically criminalizes political advocacy."
On Sunday, the National Lawyers Guild and Communities United Against Police Brutality filed an emergency motion requesting an injunction to prevent police from seizing video equipment and cellular phones used to document their conduct.
During Monday's demonstration, law enforcement officers used pepper spray, rubber bullets, concussion grenades and excessive force. At least 284 people were arrested, including Amy Goodman, the prominent host of "Democracy Now!," as well as the show's producers, Abdel Kouddous and Nicole Salazar. "St. Paul was the most militarized I have ever seen an American city to be," Greenwald wrote, "with troops of federal, state and local law enforcement agents marching around with riot gear, machine guns, and tear gas cannisters, shouting military chants and marching in military formations."
Bruce Nestor said the timing of the arrests was intended to stop protest activity, "to make people fearful of the protests, but also to discourage people from protesting," he told Amy Goodman. Nevertheless, 10,000 people, many opposed to the Iraq war, turned out to demonstrate on Monday. A legal team from the National Lawyers Guild has been working diligently to protect the constitutional rights of protesters.
»
Marjorie Cohn is president of the National Lawyers Guild and a professor at Thomas Jefferson School of Law. She is the author of "Cowboy Republic: Six Ways the Bush Gang Has Defied the Law." Her new book, "Rules of Disengagement: The Politics and Honor of Military Dissent" (co-authored with Kathleen Gilberd), will be published this winter. Her articles are archived at www.marjoriecohn.com.
Comments
Pre-Emptive Strikes Against Protest at RNC
Tuesday 02 September 2008
by: Marjorie Cohn, t r u t h o u t | Report
In the months leading up to the Republican National Convention, the FBI-led Minneapolis Joint Terrorist Task Force actively recruited people to infiltrate vegan groups and other leftist organizations and report back about their activities. On May 21, the Minneapolis City Pages ran a recruiting story called "Moles Wanted." Law enforcement sought to pre-empt lawful protest against the policies of the Bush administration during the convention.
Since Friday, local police and sheriffs, working with the FBI, conducted pre-emptive searches, seizures and arrests. Glenn Greenwald described the targeting of protesters by "teams of 25-30 officers in riot gear, with semi-automatic weapons drawn, entering homes of those suspected of planning protests, handcuffing and forcing them to lay on the floor, while law enforcement officers searched the homes, seizing computers, journals, and political pamphlets." Journalists were detained at gunpoint and lawyers representing detainees were handcuffed at the scene.
"I was personally present and saw officers with riot gear and assault rifles, pump action shotguns," said Bruce Nestor, the president of the Minnesota chapter of the National Lawyers Guild, who is representing several of the protesters. "The neighbor of one of the houses had a gun pointed in her face when she walked out on her back porch to see what was going on. There were children in all of these houses, and children were held at gunpoint."
The raids targeted members of "Food Not Bombs," an antiwar, anti-authoritarian protest group that provides free vegetarian meals every week in hundreds of cities all over the world. They served meals to rescue workers at the World Trade Center after 9/11 and to nearly 20 communities in the Gulf region following Hurricane Katrina.
Also targeted, were members of I-Witness Video, a media watchdog group that monitors the police to protect civil liberties. The group worked with the National Lawyers Guild to gain the dismissal of charges or acquittals of about 400 of the 1,800 who were arrested during the 2004 Republican National Convention in New York. Pre-emptive policing was used at that time as well. Police infiltrated protest groups in advance of the convention.
Nestor said that no violence or illegality has taken place to justify the arrests. "Seizing boxes of political literature shows the motive of these raids was political," he said.
Further evidence of the political nature of the police action was the boarding up of the Convergence Center, where protesters had gathered, for unspecified code violations. St. Paul City Council member David Thune said, "Normally we only board up buildings that are vacant and ramshackle." Thune and fellow City Council member Elizabeth Glidden decried "actions that appear excessive and create an atmosphere of fear and intimidation for those who wish to exercise their First Amendment rights."
"So here we have a massive assault led by Federal Government law enforcement agencies on left-wing dissidents and protesters who have committed no acts of violence or illegality whatsoever, preceded by months-long espionage efforts to track what they do," Greenwald wrote on Salon.
Preventive detention violates the Fourth Amendment, which requires that warrants be supported by probable cause. protesters were charged with "conspiracy to commit riot," a rarely-used statute that is so vague, it is probably unconstitutional. Nestor said it "basically criminalizes political advocacy."
On Sunday, the National Lawyers Guild and Communities United Against Police Brutality filed an emergency motion requesting an injunction to prevent police from seizing video equipment and cellular phones used to document their conduct.
During Monday's demonstration, law enforcement officers used pepper spray, rubber bullets, concussion grenades and excessive force. At least 284 people were arrested, including Amy Goodman, the prominent host of "Democracy Now!," as well as the show's producers, Abdel Kouddous and Nicole Salazar. "St. Paul was the most militarized I have ever seen an American city to be," Greenwald wrote, "with troops of federal, state and local law enforcement agents marching around with riot gear, machine guns, and tear gas cannisters, shouting military chants and marching in military formations."
Bruce Nestor said the timing of the arrests was intended to stop protest activity, "to make people fearful of the protests, but also to discourage people from protesting," he told Amy Goodman. Nevertheless, 10,000 people, many opposed to the Iraq war, turned out to demonstrate on Monday. A legal team from the National Lawyers Guild has been working diligently to protect the constitutional rights of protesters.
»
Marjorie Cohn is president of the National Lawyers Guild and a professor at Thomas Jefferson School of Law. She is the author of "Cowboy Republic: Six Ways the Bush Gang Has Defied the Law." Her new book, "Rules of Disengagement: The Politics and Honor of Military Dissent" (co-authored with Kathleen Gilberd), will be published this winter. Her articles are archived at www.marjoriecohn.com.
Comments
Wednesday, September 3, 2008
Aid Workers and Defense
Today we met a man named Frederick Baccaan who has spent roughly 25 years doing the logistics of aid for Medecin du Monde, a small independent NGO based in Paris. Frederick has been through countless conflict and disaster scenarios in places the DRC, Sudan, Uganda, Pakistan, Iraq, Tibet, etc, as well as just showed up to build medical facilities where there were none. As a logistics specialist, his job was basically to provide housing, transportation, and safety to the doctors and nurses working with Medecin du Monde. In places like the Congo, Indonesia after the tsunami, or Darfur, this can obviously be an extremely difficult task. After a very long, exciting, and moving discussion about his life and work, Frederick commented on a dramatic change he saw roughly around the year 2002. Previously, being white and wearing the uniform of aid workers was generally enough to ensure safe passage anywhere in the globe. Now, however, aid workers are increasingly targets of violence, rape, looting, and murders, as they are seen as proxies for government rather than neutral entities. This dramatic shift came around, interestingly, right after the beginning of the Iraq war and has presented a whole new set of problems for aid workers. Aid workers traditionally carry no weapons, and often have images on their vehicles and buildings proclaiming that they do not carry weapons. They are in a country to heal- not to hurt. As they increasingly become victims of aggressive violence, however, the idea of doctors and nurses being able to defend themselves is becoming more widely discussed. While carrying weapons would invite more hostility as well as cause the aid workers to be rejected more often by the populations they are trying to help, it may provide them the protection they need to save the life of themselves or others in a critical moment.
Frederick shared his opinion through a story of his time in Iraq. One night, the office and home of Frederick and the two doctors he worked with (one male, one female) were attacked by looters. They climbed to the roof while the looters, armed with machine guns and ranging in age from about 15-17, stole valuable medical equipment, broke into the safe, stole computers, cell phones, and drugs. Frederick called for help on the radio to the UN, but was told the situation was too dangerous to send help. If Frederick had been armed with a gun, he could have killed the looters- Iraqi teenagers- and had Medecins du Monde pulled out of Iraq. He could have fired into the air, showing that this medical hospital was really a place of violence, and perhaps invited retaliation later or invited the looters to come to the roof with their guns drawn. As it was, he had no weapon, and the fear that the female doctor would be raped and all three of them murdered. Would this be an acceptable price to pay to keep the presence of Medecins du Monde in Iraq, savings hundreds of women and children? As it was, Frederick' driver had kept his radio on all through the night, and heard his call for help. Just as two looters arrived on the roof, the driver and the Iraqi police arrived and chased them away. Non violence, in this situation, kept Frederick and his group alive as well as the Iraqi teenagers. If he had killed them, what kind of retaliation may the police and citizens have taken?
I do not think that aid workers should be armed- they are willingly going into a traumatic situation where they know they are targets, hoping that their actions and their relationships with the host population will keep them safe. To go in with guns is to forcefully impose their actions upon the population, and to represent a military power. Especially because NGO's are private organizations and can be run however their leadership sees fit, they should not show up in the gear of a humanitarian only to kill the people they're trying to help when they feel at risk. Weapons will cause more hostility and prevent them from doing their work properly by closing doors that would have been open otherwise.
Frederick shared his opinion through a story of his time in Iraq. One night, the office and home of Frederick and the two doctors he worked with (one male, one female) were attacked by looters. They climbed to the roof while the looters, armed with machine guns and ranging in age from about 15-17, stole valuable medical equipment, broke into the safe, stole computers, cell phones, and drugs. Frederick called for help on the radio to the UN, but was told the situation was too dangerous to send help. If Frederick had been armed with a gun, he could have killed the looters- Iraqi teenagers- and had Medecins du Monde pulled out of Iraq. He could have fired into the air, showing that this medical hospital was really a place of violence, and perhaps invited retaliation later or invited the looters to come to the roof with their guns drawn. As it was, he had no weapon, and the fear that the female doctor would be raped and all three of them murdered. Would this be an acceptable price to pay to keep the presence of Medecins du Monde in Iraq, savings hundreds of women and children? As it was, Frederick' driver had kept his radio on all through the night, and heard his call for help. Just as two looters arrived on the roof, the driver and the Iraqi police arrived and chased them away. Non violence, in this situation, kept Frederick and his group alive as well as the Iraqi teenagers. If he had killed them, what kind of retaliation may the police and citizens have taken?
I do not think that aid workers should be armed- they are willingly going into a traumatic situation where they know they are targets, hoping that their actions and their relationships with the host population will keep them safe. To go in with guns is to forcefully impose their actions upon the population, and to represent a military power. Especially because NGO's are private organizations and can be run however their leadership sees fit, they should not show up in the gear of a humanitarian only to kill the people they're trying to help when they feel at risk. Weapons will cause more hostility and prevent them from doing their work properly by closing doors that would have been open otherwise.
Monday, September 1, 2008
Some thoughts on Paris, travel, and the program
Paris is one of the world's most famous international cities, a city of romance, fashion, culture, and history. It's also one of the last places on earth I would chose to go to. I love travel and have been to a few different countries (Ireland, Canada, Mexico, Australia, France), but have never found explorations through Western nations to be at all fulfilling. The countries that I feel drawn to lie more along the lines of Cuba, Argentina, Venezuela, Chile, Egypt, the Congo, Kosovo, India, Kenya, South Africa, Iraq, Thailand. I want to see cultures that are completely different, governments that are different, ways of life that are different. I want to learn from other cultures, explore their values, to give and take what I can. I want to see revolution alive in the hearts and minds of people.
Then why, you may ask, did I come to Switzerland? Why did I study French instead of Spanish? Well, long ago when I began taking language classes, Spanish was completely full and I was more or less “stuck” with French, which I decided to pursue in college for that easier A. For study abroad, the vast majority of programs in the countries I feel drawn to were either cultural and therefore not at all conductive to my major and graduation requirements, or required 1-2 years of Spanish. Feeling interested by Geneva as the hub of international organizations, neutrality, and one of the world's oldest and truest democracies, as well as by my own Swiss heritage, I chose this program in development studies and public health. Hopefully the connections and concepts I gain here and at UPS will allow me to, one day, travel to the places I dream of for real work and not just tourism.
Back to the subject of this post, however; Paris. What can I say? Most of the food is good, I enjoy the baguettes au fromage. The portions are extremely small, and everything- a small beverage or tiny to go crepe- costs at least 5 euro, and you can expect to spend 15-20 even on a modest meal. Knowing that the euro is worth almost twice as much as the dollar makes the high cost of food even harder to stomach. Wait staff often ignores you, whether you're trying to get a menu or trying to pay- the average French meal seems to take 2-3 hours, contrary to US restaurants where you are sent packing as quickly as possible.
The city is absolutely picturesque in appearance, however. Tall, adorable buildings with little balconies, adorned with peeling paint and colorful flower boxes. Everywhere you look, there are beautifully dressed Parisian women wearing their slim fit pants, sac-like dresses, and brand names like Channel. Stilettos are the norm, despite the uneven cobblestones. The weather has been for the most part beautiful, and the Louvre, Tour Eiffel, Notre Dame, etc are of course lovely. We met a girl from Japan the other night who had traveled extensively on her own over the last 8 years and was now living in Paris- unfortunately I have to agree with her that Parisians come off rich and snobbish, with the most friendly people being other tourists. One thing I do really appreciate about the city is the frequency with which you can find a fruit stand, which has far more variety than any typical U.S. grocery store.
The sticker shock- I return to that again. Even a bottle of water here costs about 2 euro, or almost four dollars. To order water at a restaurant is to pay closer to 5 euro. Oh yes, the Red Light District of Paris. Basically an endless row of cheap, tiny run down sex shops like that creepy one on sixth avenue, punctuated by the occasional peep show, club, or one sex museum. I was definitely not impressed- and then we tried to buy a bottle of wine, but because it was after 9pm, they wouldn't sell it to us at the nearby grocery store- very peculiar. Oh la la!
As for the group of students I am with, they all seem to be genuinely nice people who care about the world, mostly focusing their studies on international affairs and health. We all have such different backgrounds though- most are rich enough to have traveled far more extensively than I have, and many come from universities that teach strictly the dominant models of, well, everything. Needless to say, I'm having a bit of a hard time making meaningful connections with people from sororities, or who see the world ONLY in the same way the U.S government and Ivy League professors do. My roommate in Paris is absolutely wonderful; she is Indian American and has incredibly strong cultural ties, which is very excited for me because I have spent so much time recently studying India in terms of politics, economics, culture, and gender studies.
Mostly I am excited to get into the heart of our studies and spend time with my Swiss host family, which is made up of a mother and father and their two daughters who are both teachers in their mid twenties. I am really excited to settle into a home, meet Swiss friends, and begin work on our ISP projects. Our program is almost unsettlingly unstructured, but really excellent. Basically we spend every day meeting professionals, hearing their lectures, and interacting with them on a professional basis, we are immersed in French both in society as well as in our French class at the Ecole Club Migros, and we are to receive specific training in independent field research. This program was developed by Earl, who is with us nearly every day, and really seeks to make us into competent, successful adults rather than just occupying our time with class and taking our money. It turns out we have far more freedom than I expected- no curfews, no need to stay here or there, we can travel where ever we want whenever we want as long as we still attend our seminars and meetings. We receive a stipend for meals outside the home and are encouraged to dive into the culture and become as authentic as possible. I've never really been treated this way before in a similar setting- as if we're truly on the same level as the people we are meeting, like officials in the UN and Doctors without Borders. We get a UN Security Clearance Card once in Geneva to have access to their library, which is really exciting to me.
A final note on Paris. Where have all the punks gone? Certainly there are not here. And everyone has tiny little dogs and no place to walk them, so the sidewalks are covered in animal feces and cigarette butts- the city of love indeed!
Then why, you may ask, did I come to Switzerland? Why did I study French instead of Spanish? Well, long ago when I began taking language classes, Spanish was completely full and I was more or less “stuck” with French, which I decided to pursue in college for that easier A. For study abroad, the vast majority of programs in the countries I feel drawn to were either cultural and therefore not at all conductive to my major and graduation requirements, or required 1-2 years of Spanish. Feeling interested by Geneva as the hub of international organizations, neutrality, and one of the world's oldest and truest democracies, as well as by my own Swiss heritage, I chose this program in development studies and public health. Hopefully the connections and concepts I gain here and at UPS will allow me to, one day, travel to the places I dream of for real work and not just tourism.
Back to the subject of this post, however; Paris. What can I say? Most of the food is good, I enjoy the baguettes au fromage. The portions are extremely small, and everything- a small beverage or tiny to go crepe- costs at least 5 euro, and you can expect to spend 15-20 even on a modest meal. Knowing that the euro is worth almost twice as much as the dollar makes the high cost of food even harder to stomach. Wait staff often ignores you, whether you're trying to get a menu or trying to pay- the average French meal seems to take 2-3 hours, contrary to US restaurants where you are sent packing as quickly as possible.
The city is absolutely picturesque in appearance, however. Tall, adorable buildings with little balconies, adorned with peeling paint and colorful flower boxes. Everywhere you look, there are beautifully dressed Parisian women wearing their slim fit pants, sac-like dresses, and brand names like Channel. Stilettos are the norm, despite the uneven cobblestones. The weather has been for the most part beautiful, and the Louvre, Tour Eiffel, Notre Dame, etc are of course lovely. We met a girl from Japan the other night who had traveled extensively on her own over the last 8 years and was now living in Paris- unfortunately I have to agree with her that Parisians come off rich and snobbish, with the most friendly people being other tourists. One thing I do really appreciate about the city is the frequency with which you can find a fruit stand, which has far more variety than any typical U.S. grocery store.
The sticker shock- I return to that again. Even a bottle of water here costs about 2 euro, or almost four dollars. To order water at a restaurant is to pay closer to 5 euro. Oh yes, the Red Light District of Paris. Basically an endless row of cheap, tiny run down sex shops like that creepy one on sixth avenue, punctuated by the occasional peep show, club, or one sex museum. I was definitely not impressed- and then we tried to buy a bottle of wine, but because it was after 9pm, they wouldn't sell it to us at the nearby grocery store- very peculiar. Oh la la!
As for the group of students I am with, they all seem to be genuinely nice people who care about the world, mostly focusing their studies on international affairs and health. We all have such different backgrounds though- most are rich enough to have traveled far more extensively than I have, and many come from universities that teach strictly the dominant models of, well, everything. Needless to say, I'm having a bit of a hard time making meaningful connections with people from sororities, or who see the world ONLY in the same way the U.S government and Ivy League professors do. My roommate in Paris is absolutely wonderful; she is Indian American and has incredibly strong cultural ties, which is very excited for me because I have spent so much time recently studying India in terms of politics, economics, culture, and gender studies.
Mostly I am excited to get into the heart of our studies and spend time with my Swiss host family, which is made up of a mother and father and their two daughters who are both teachers in their mid twenties. I am really excited to settle into a home, meet Swiss friends, and begin work on our ISP projects. Our program is almost unsettlingly unstructured, but really excellent. Basically we spend every day meeting professionals, hearing their lectures, and interacting with them on a professional basis, we are immersed in French both in society as well as in our French class at the Ecole Club Migros, and we are to receive specific training in independent field research. This program was developed by Earl, who is with us nearly every day, and really seeks to make us into competent, successful adults rather than just occupying our time with class and taking our money. It turns out we have far more freedom than I expected- no curfews, no need to stay here or there, we can travel where ever we want whenever we want as long as we still attend our seminars and meetings. We receive a stipend for meals outside the home and are encouraged to dive into the culture and become as authentic as possible. I've never really been treated this way before in a similar setting- as if we're truly on the same level as the people we are meeting, like officials in the UN and Doctors without Borders. We get a UN Security Clearance Card once in Geneva to have access to their library, which is really exciting to me.
A final note on Paris. Where have all the punks gone? Certainly there are not here. And everyone has tiny little dogs and no place to walk them, so the sidewalks are covered in animal feces and cigarette butts- the city of love indeed!
Saturday, August 30, 2008
Thursday, August 28, 2008
Where is my mind
Oh - stop
With your feet in the air and your head on the ground
Try this trick and spin it, yeah
Your head will collapse
But there's nothing in it
And you'll ask yourself
Where is my mind?
Where is my mind?
Where is my mind?
Way out in the water
See it swimmin'
Well, my mind is certainly not on the shopping, the sights, the people, and the food of Paris; while this city has a lot of historical value, I'm not sure where to find the revolutionaries, and I am missing the streets of Amsterdam. My mind, however, is on neither city; instead I am thinking of Denver, and of the thousands of activists converging on the DNC to show Obama that America cares about peace, the environment, our troops, about education, about health care; to show Obama that the people of America care about people, not making the richest richer, not making our economy the strongest in the world, not making America more powerful. We care about individual rights and freedoms in a balance with safe and healthy communities. We care about the future. How do the police respond? Pepper spray, beatings, and raids on non-violent protesters, by violating the same civil liberties that we exercised to become a nation in the first place.
The Democratic National Convention is playing host to more intense patriotism than America has seen ever in recent years- check out the latest episode of sub-media to see footage from the REAL democratic convention taking place outside the pepsi stadium. http://www.themelononline.com/2008/08/dnc-video-dispatch-3.html
all of these episodes should be available on sub-media.tv : stay informed!
Et oui, j'ai vu la Louvre.
With your feet in the air and your head on the ground
Try this trick and spin it, yeah
Your head will collapse
But there's nothing in it
And you'll ask yourself
Where is my mind?
Where is my mind?
Where is my mind?
Way out in the water
See it swimmin'
Well, my mind is certainly not on the shopping, the sights, the people, and the food of Paris; while this city has a lot of historical value, I'm not sure where to find the revolutionaries, and I am missing the streets of Amsterdam. My mind, however, is on neither city; instead I am thinking of Denver, and of the thousands of activists converging on the DNC to show Obama that America cares about peace, the environment, our troops, about education, about health care; to show Obama that the people of America care about people, not making the richest richer, not making our economy the strongest in the world, not making America more powerful. We care about individual rights and freedoms in a balance with safe and healthy communities. We care about the future. How do the police respond? Pepper spray, beatings, and raids on non-violent protesters, by violating the same civil liberties that we exercised to become a nation in the first place.
The Democratic National Convention is playing host to more intense patriotism than America has seen ever in recent years- check out the latest episode of sub-media to see footage from the REAL democratic convention taking place outside the pepsi stadium. http://www.themelononline.com/2008/08/dnc-video-dispatch-3.html
all of these episodes should be available on sub-media.tv : stay informed!
Et oui, j'ai vu la Louvre.
Wednesday, August 27, 2008
To Love Obama
I've been in Paris for less than 12 hours, and have been asked about Obama by four Frenchies. Upon recognizing my accent, these people excitedly asked if I was voting for Obama and what I thought about him. While I can honestly say that I'd prefer Obama to the rat republican party any day, Obama still isn't the heroic idealist everyone seems to be making him out to be. His energy policy is, well, bad ("clean" coal and arctic oil drilling), and he still stands for more free market policies than I'm comfortable with. We can only hope that, once elected, Obama will use his golden hour, the first 100 excited and exuberant days, to pass progressive, sustainable, and more Keynesian policies than he is promising. All too often, however, money interests and bad economists have a way of turning even the most idealistic leaders into traitors to the people they represent. I recently began reading Naomi Klein's book, The Shock Doctrine, and I have to admit that Ive been moved to tears again and again by the facts and connections she has revealed. Once I finish the book, I'll dedicate a full post to a review- until then, you should check it out. More details on Paris next time kids.
peace and love,
peace and love,
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)